- Oct 23, 2014
- 28,825
- 40,517
LMFAO, Both have only been in the league 1 year, And we're already talking about a change of scenery. Both teams easily decline.
I think NY would probably do it. I probably would as a fan. devils definitely dont.
LMFAO, Both have only been in the league 1 year, And we're already talking about a change of scenery. Both teams easily decline.
NJ chose Hughes once already and he's been more productive than Kakko thus far, so why would they reverse that decision?
Holloway plays C. Just because he had to play wing for Team Canada right after draft being behind guys like Dach and Cozens doesn't mean he will be a winger in NHL. He will be very good on dot and will be responsible at both end of ice playing C.That seems like an overpayment from Edmonton, and still doesn't address the Rangers' center depth issue. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Do you think a change of scenery for both would do some good?
Rangers lack C depth and maybe Kravtsov can take Kakko’s spot.
Would NJ do this?
I'd be very surprised if Holland offered thatOilers offer Holloway + Broberg for Kakko
No, they don't.Oilers offer Holloway + Broberg for Kakko
I'd be very surprised if Holland offered that
Why do all your proposals suck? And why do you keep creating so many?Do you think a change of scenery for both would do some good?
Rangers lack C depth and maybe Kravtsov can take Kakko’s spot.
Would NJ do this?
Gorton has already said Kakko is not available— so whatever your silly thoughts are, Kakko would cost a lot since the organization sees him as an integral part of the team going forward.Kakko cant cost much.
You managed to take 3 players out of their natural position that they ultimately want to play.handful of a few b'c Kakko has not been a scoring machine from day 1 is short sighted folly.
Also HC Quinn has not used him best this season.
finally getting some mins w/breadman + looks good
that line should be
Kakko lw -- Kravtsov C -- Panarin RW
Do you think a change of scenery for both would do some good?
Rangers lack C depth and maybe Kravtsov can take Kakko’s spot.
Would NJ do this?
While this proposal is awful, Kakko has been much better this year than his numbers indicate. He will be a very good player and we would absolutely trade Mercer for him.Not sure I even trade Mercer for Kakko right now
Yeah Jack Hughes is definitely > Kappo Kakko. Gorton would accept the Devils would decline.I think NY would probably do it. I probably would as a fan. devils definitely dont.
He's more productive and more flashy. Jack will have the puck a lot more than Kakko and will use his skating to create zone entries, but I think Kakko has a better overall game this season. He's become one of our best defensive forwards. Now - that's not really what you're looking for from the #2 pick. But if Kakko ever finds his production, he'll be a really good 2-way player.Yeah Jack Hughes is definitely > Kappo Kakko. Gorton would accept the Devils would decline.
Yeah, correct! No way we trade a guy to each other to crush us in our meetings. Both GMS would be dumb to consider. We should just continue the hate for each other, its better that way! ; )Nope they wouldn’t.
Value aside these teams have only made I think 1 trade together lol. Grabner...2 years ago? Irrelevant but a fun fact