jimmy page said:I'd put Fleury at #3 ahead of Malkin and Zherdev.
NYRangers said:Constructive Criticism for the HF crew: If you guys want to be 'more professional' like I've heard I'd suggest not condradicting yourself so blatanly. On the Pens page Malkin is behind Fluery but on the top 50 Malkin is ahead of Fluery.
I realize different people make both lists but its something to consider.
Caniacforever said:One thing that I really don't get is how players like Bergeron and Staal aren't eligible for this list and players like Horton and Zherdev are. Horton would have played a full NHL season if not for injuries, and he still played a great deal of the season and played a pretty decent amount. Zherdev played a lot for CBJ this year as well. What was the GP cut off list for this list?
Once again, disappointed not to see Cam Ward crack the list. The main oversight.
Caniacforever said:One thing that I really don't get is how players like Bergeron and Staal aren't eligible for this list and players like Horton and Zherdev are. Horton would have played a full NHL season if not for injuries, and he still played a great deal of the season and played a pretty decent amount. Zherdev played a lot for CBJ this year as well. What was the GP cut off list for this list?
Once again, disappointed not to see Cam Ward crack the list. The main oversight.
SmokeyClause said:Yeah, I don't understand the 65 games (I think that is what it is) cutoff. Why not go with 80-82 to represent a full season. It doesn't make sense to punish a durable player and cater to one who gets injured. I think it should be closer to 100 myself. Are you telling me that a kid like Chistov isn't still a prospect?
Mothra said:I dont think you do
NYRangers said:The cutoff should be 25 games. Just like it is in the NHL.
craig1 said:That's rookie status. Not prospect status.
NYRangers said:There is no prospect status number in the NHL is there? So if someone isnt a rookie they shouldnt be a prospect IMO.