bsu
"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
- Sep 27, 2017
- 28,539
- 29,291
It's almost time! Hockey is back tomorrow! Will update lineup when available.
Last edited:
NiceApparently sharks app is streaming the game....get the VPN ready
That game was awful, the fact that BM allowed it to get to that point was ridiculous.Yeah that game when RC refused to pull Gibby for an extended period of time was brutal.
Carlyle got worse every season, rapidly. He basically sucked the life out of this team. And seeing how teammates were standing by Gibby that game, it looks it was more of a coaches fault. But we'll see, the players have every opportunity to have a breakout year although it will be more difficult. Let's see if Getzy is still a 1C caliber
Agreed, with the way Eakins will run things the 4th line should get at least 8 minutes a night & then add in like 2 to 4 minutes of PK for Jones & 2 to 4 minutes of PP for Sprong.I agree that I just don't feel Sprong gets on the top 3 lines as RW...Kase, Silf, and Terry all are priorities for different reasons. But I do want him skating regularly. I feel he's put in a ton of work and effort, and deserves the shot.
I still don't know who makes the team...I'm with some of the others that think Comtois would be better served by developing another year. At this point, even though he hasn't produced well, I think I prefer Jones just due to how massive, quick, and relentless he is.
Consider that we should be closer to rolling 4 lines than ever. Even if we have, say, Jones and Sprong on the 4th line, they should still get reasonable minutes.
LW then would be Rakell, Ritchie, Shore, and Jones. Don't think we need Deslauriers except as backup.
With Jones and Sprong on the 4th and probably getting slightly less ice time, give Jones some PK time, and Sprong some PP time. In my mind, it works out.
I think Steel will score some goals this season, puck seems to find the net with him and the way he played last year in the NHL has me thinking he could have 18 to 22 goals this year.
Agreed, with the way Eakins will run things the 4th line should get at least 8 minutes a night & then add in like 2 to 4 minutes of PK for Jones & 2 to 4 minutes of PP for Sprong.
I feel confident we'll be seeing Sprong firing his slapper on the PP and Jones creating scoring chances on the PK as well as him frustrating other teams
Yeah a Jones/Rowney/Sprong line could get 10-12 minutes & then add in the extra time that Jones gets on the PK & Sprong on the PP.Firstly, I think I'd prefer to see a bit more even playing time for all forward lines. You can lean a bit more on the top 2 lines, but let's say (given an average game not including special teams), I'd like to see 16, 16, 14, 12, unless one line is just having an amazing night. You'll get the special teams players getting a minute or two more of ice time average based on what calls are being made, but that would mean Getzy would be leaned on less, keeping him fresher throughout the season.
Then, in this type of situation, Jones and Sprong, even on the 4th line, could have enough playing time (unless you only consider 16-18 minutes a night to be worth it for playing against NHL level competition).
I don't discount Sprong at all. I just look at Terry, Kase, and Silf, and think all of them will be prioritized. Or do you think one of those 3 should be in the 4RW spot? But on PP, you can roll 4 forwards on both lines...Terry, Kase, and Sprong can get PP time, while Silf will get PK time. Being a regular on a PP unit should also give him some confidence.
And, of course, if we get a situation where one of the other RWs gets hurt (knock on wood), push him to one of those lines, and bring in Sherwood (or use Grant or whoever) to cover that 4RW spot.
Not having Kesler out there during a PP will help alot.The swapping of Steel for Kesler is going to give the Ducks a significant boost in so many different ways. One way is that Steel can actually skate faster than Kesler, so that 200-foot game that GM Murray likes will be there. Another is scoring production.
Kelser: 60 games, scoring 5 goals + 3 assists = 8 points, and -19 rating. ATOI = 16:30
Although Steel did play in a total of 22 games, his production splits revealed improvement.
2018: 13 games, scoring 1 goal + 2 assists = 3 points, and -3 rating
2019: 9 games, scoring 5 goals + 3 assists = 8 points, and +5 rating
Steel's total ATOI = 15:58
Swapping Steel for Kesler (this year's and last year's Kesler, not the dominant Kesler we haven't seen in a couple of years) is the biggest game changer going into this season! Play his cards right, and Steel could vie for the Calder Trophy.
I disagree. From what I've seen, Comtois has the tools to become an impact player in the NHL, and I want to see him do it. FWIW, I don't see a big disparity in offensive capability among any of our "top 3" lines. Whether it's Ritchie/Getz/Kase-Terry, or Raks/Steel/Silf, or Comtois/Rico/Kase-Terry, all 3 can be viable scoring threats. Comtois helps make them that, which Jones doesn't IMHO. Maybe Sprong earns his way into the top 9, I don't know. But I like having 3 lines that other teams can't ignore.I think Comtos should start in the AHL. I dont think Jones has the high end offensive package your getting with Comtois. Give Maxime 1st line and 1st PP in San Diego for awhile and let Jones play 4th line and PK in Anaheim.
Firstly, I think I'd prefer to see a bit more even playing time for all forward lines. You can lean a bit more on the top 2 lines, but let's say (given an average game not including special teams), I'd like to see 16, 16, 14, 12, unless one line is just having an amazing night. You'll get the special teams players getting a minute or two more of ice time average based on what calls are being made, but that would mean Getzy would be leaned on less, keeping him fresher throughout the season.
Then, in this type of situation, Jones and Sprong, even on the 4th line, could have enough playing time (unless you only consider 16-18 minutes a night to be worth it for playing against NHL level competition).
I don't discount Sprong at all. I just look at Terry, Kase, and Silf, and think all of them will be prioritized. Or do you think one of those 3 should be in the 4RW spot? But on PP, you can roll 4 forwards on both lines...Terry, Kase, and Sprong can get PP time, while Silf will get PK time. Being a regular on a PP unit should also give him some confidence.
And, of course, if we get a situation where one of the other RWs gets hurt (knock on wood), push him to one of those lines, and bring in Sherwood (or use Grant or whoever) to cover that 4RW spot.
Oh and one more point, IMO. Sprong gaining confidence doesn't need to necessarily be in a top 9 spot. All he probably needs is to be a regular in the lineup. Last year he was in and out. Make him a permanent fixture and I'm pretty sure he's a happy camper...at least compared to how he's been treated to this point.
And then don't make the 4th line a throwaway line. Putting Jones on that line would make it a bit more legit, I think.