Evilo said:Hainsey and Aulin are a tad high IMO.
I would pick Krajicek over Hainsey right now.
And Fehr over Aulin.
You don't think Aulin's ranking would be higher if he'd played this season?
Evilo said:Hainsey and Aulin are a tad high IMO.
I would pick Krajicek over Hainsey right now.
And Fehr over Aulin.
Maybe Eriksson is top 30? Its possible, not too likely, but possible.Modano = God said:No Eriksson, Miettinen, Daley or Jokinen is pretty sad, especially since I don't agree with alot of prospects being on it. Guess the Stars prospects will continue to be underrated anyway..
SUPERMAN said:Yes it seems so, at the swedish page www.eliteprospects.com, on the left side, top 100 prospect, Loui Erikssson moved up from 4th to 2nd place just after Alexander Steen and before Robert Nilsson, updated in march 2004,
Well the apparent ranking system is flawed mathematically speaking. I'm assuming that they sit down a bunch of writers (5 perhaps) and ask them to rank the players in order from 1 to 50.Modano = God said:So basicly, Eriksson should be ranked somewhere between Steen and Nilsson. Somewhere around 25th/30th. Yet he isn't ranked at all. Last year it was Antti Miettinen that was nowhere to be found, whereas he accomplished the exact same as Henrik Zetterberg. The Stars prospects seriously need to get some attention around here. I'm not asking for much, just a consideration or honorable mention will do.
Don't you worry about that... Loui Eriksson will be top 30 next year.Modano = God said:So basicly, Eriksson should be ranked somewhere between Steen and Nilsson. Somewhere around 25th/30th. Yet he isn't ranked at all. Last year it was Antti Miettinen that was nowhere to be found, whereas he accomplished the exact same as Henrik Zetterberg. The Stars prospects seriously need to get some attention around here. I'm not asking for much, just a consideration or honorable mention will do.
BlueAndWhite said:Well the apparent ranking system is flawed mathematically speaking. I'm assuming that they sit down a bunch of writers (5 perhaps) and ask them to rank the players in order from 1 to 50.
Therefore, if one person ommitted Eriksson from their list (very likely scenario) and the rest of the writers had him at 40, the average ranking would have Eriksson somewhere outside the top 50.
It works the same for one ranking of a particular player being very high as opposed to very low.
Modano = God said:So basicly, Eriksson should be ranked somewhere between Steen and Nilsson. Somewhere around 25th/30th. Yet he isn't ranked at all. Last year it was Antti Miettinen that was nowhere to be found, whereas he accomplished the exact same as Henrik Zetterberg. The Stars prospects seriously need to get some attention around here. I'm not asking for much, just a consideration or honorable mention will do.
I'm not sure how Zetterberg and Miettinen accomplished the exact same, since they played in two totally different leagues.Modano = God said:So basicly, Eriksson should be ranked somewhere between Steen and Nilsson. Somewhere around 25th/30th. Yet he isn't ranked at all. Last year it was Antti Miettinen that was nowhere to be found, whereas he accomplished the exact same as Henrik Zetterberg. The Stars prospects seriously need to get some attention around here. I'm not asking for much, just a consideration or honorable mention will do.
BlueAndWhite said:I'm not sure how Zetterberg and Miettinen accomplished the exact same, since they played in two totally different leagues.
As well, Miettinen is at a fantastic 7 goals, 26 total points in 40 games pace with the Utah Grizzlies of the AHL at the age at 24. He isn't exactly the poster child of being under-appreciated.
Enoch said:For everyone complaining about prospect ratings, at least you have a writer that does an update more than once a year. We have players chosen from last years draft that are still unranked......good ones at that.
Koltsov said:woohoo, Kirill Koltsov must be in the top 30!
Not after the injuries.X-SHARKIE said:Michalek is top 5 IMO...I look forward to the 1-10.
CapsIntensity68 said:Fehr
He has been a bright spot this year, one of just a few. top 25 next year?
Mizral said:I'm quite shocked they had any Habs prospects ahead of Perezhogin to be honest. I feel he's their best guy.
HiggsFan said:I can agree with that.
Perezhogin is definatly not well ranked this year... as he is the Canadiens' best prospect in terms of hockey sense, as well as pure offensive instincts. I would have put him WAY ahead of Ron Hainsey, who, eventhough he is having a decent season with Hamilton, still has a long way to go. As far as I'm concerned, Perezhogin could be in the NHL right now and wouldn't look lost at all.
I feel he's one of the most NHL-ready forwards in Hamilton too (the most NHL-ready is probably Tomas Plekanec)
Fedz said:How in the world is Robert Nilsson ahead of Chris Higgins on the list? BTW, you've got Leksand down as Nilssons team, when really hes playing for a team in Switzerland.
Other words, great work guys!
Koltsov said:woohoo, Kirill Koltsov must be in the top 30!