themelkman
Always Delivers
Maybe, its a big ask.Can he become our EEK?
I think if he is a third line center you are happy
Maybe, its a big ask.Can he become our EEK?
"without experience and development" well damn, I sure hope kids picked in the draft play to gain experience and to develop..Will Scouch has him in his fifth tier - Role players and higher end projects, ranked 56th.
Didnt seem to write about him at all though other than to say "Names like Goyette, Del Bel Belluz, Beck, Ingram, Bystedt, Zhilkin and Snuggerud are all part of an up-and-down set of forwards with some traits in some areas that drive good results now, but may have issues in the NHL without experience and development."
Like I said it isnt really saying much, but I think it is a fair thing to say considering some prospects dont ever get the focus or chances."without experience and development" well damn, I sure hope kids picked in the draft play to gain experience and to develop..
Yeah... I guess they saw something special in Filip and will give him the right treatment so to speak.Like I said it isnt really saying much, but I think it is a fair thing to say considering some prospects dont ever get the focus or chances.
I especially get nervous with the swedish professional teams as they can leave rookies in some pretty bad spots that make them look bad (ie Eklund this year) and I dont know how much developing you do there.
Will Scouch has him in his fifth tier - Role players and higher end projects, ranked 56th.
Didnt seem to write about him at all though other than to say "Names like Goyette, Del Bel Belluz, Beck, Ingram, Bystedt, Zhilkin and Snuggerud are all part of an up-and-down set of forwards with some traits in some areas that drive good results now, but may have issues in the NHL without experience and development."
Its not a specific report about him really, naturally the focus is on guys up the list with less of the lower list guys getting write ups.Unless you are a can't miss top guy that walks into the NHL and dominates like Matthews, McDavid, Crosby, or Ovechkin, you are a prospect that will be developing his skillset and needing experience to improve. That is the most basic scouting assessment I can think of.
Just because I was interested, our current Swedish scouts are Niklas Sundstrom and the director of european scouting Shin Larsson who is probably also based in Sweden.
Its not a specific report about him really, naturally the focus is on guys up the list with less of the lower list guys getting write ups.
You don't get SHL minutes as a 17 and 18 year old if you're just some plug. It's one of the best pro leagues in the world. The reaction to this pick from some fans is ridiculous.
I don’t hate this, from The Hockey Writers:
“Where he fits there will be dependent on how he develops offensively. If he can improve his release or the execution of his passing, preferably both, he will be a solid second-line center for any team. If he can’t, he will have to rely on his defensive ability and size to play a shut-down third-line center role.”
If we get a second line center out of him, we should be psyched (for a 27 pick. Even for a 11 pick). Even third line shouldn’t be too disappointing. He sounds like he has a lot of potential, just needs to put it all together.
With 2 2nd round picks left, I like diversifying.
I’m not that upset at where they drafted him although I would have preferred Kulich or Lambert because they have some semblance of being top of the lineup players. I’m upset at giving up 11 which had Nazar, Mateychuk, Lekkerimaki and Kemell on the board. Their shot of being top of the lineup guys is so much higher.So if he's saying that Bystedt was a late-first, early-2nd guy...shouldn't you be satisfied? That's where the Sharks drafted him.
If Nazar, Mateychuk, Lekkerimaki or Kemell genuinely had a high chance of being top of the lineup guys they would have gone much higher. The track record of prospects drafted 10th-15th turning into top of the lineup NHLers is pretty bad. Even the few who do are guys nobody expected to who take 5-8 years to reach that level like Nichushkin, JT Miller, Fiala, Vrana, McDonagh. Maybe once a decade you get a Karlsson or McAvoy in that range who is a star immediately. Historically most picks in that range turn out to be depth players or outright busts.I’m not that upset at where they drafted him although I would have preferred Kulich or Lambert because they have some semblance of being top of the lineup players. I’m upset at giving up 11 which had Nazar, Mateychuk, Lekkerimaki and Kemell on the board. Their shot of being top of the lineup guys is so much higher.
Now maybe I’ll feel better if we select some high ceiling second rounders but if we don’t it’s just going to be a struggle of a draft
If Nazar, Mateychuk, Lekkerimaki or Kemell genuinely had a high chance of being top of the lineup guys they would have gone much higher. The track record of prospects drafted 10th-15th turning into top of the lineup NHLers is pretty bad. Even the few who do are guys nobody expected to who take 5-8 years to reach that level like Nichushkin, JT Miller, Fiala, Vrana, McDonagh. Maybe once a decade you get a Karlsson or McAvoy in that range who is a star immediately. Historically most picks in that range turn out to be depth players or outright busts.
All of this is to say Bystedt is probably not much worse of a prospect than whoever you wanted the Sharks to take at 11. Especially since this has always looked like a weak first round crop beyond Wright, Savoie and the top two defensemen.
Fan shout out
I totally forgot about that. If he plays in the AHL this year then we can probably be sure this was a factor.I wonder if they used the first rounder on Bystedt because of the SHL agreement banning prospects that aren’t drafted in the first from coming over and playing in the AHL. Maybe a reach but maybe they did it while having some players in the second round they would have drafted ahead. Or I’m misunderstanding the agreement.