Hawkaholic
Registered User
who play #5 minutes and are part of the reason you lose a playoff series?? yeah we should probably *****.
See, we are lucky..
who play #5 minutes and are part of the reason you lose a playoff series?? yeah we should probably *****.
It does show you how lucky we are as a fan base. Other fans are *****ing about their teams trading their best players. We are *****ing about signing 13th forward and 6/7th Dman.
Positions that've had huge parts in our eliminations from playoff series since 2011
Last year Mash maybe. Rozy, his 20+ games were already talked about. He was good early on IMO. THe man crush is over as another posted.I don't understand how anybody could have watched the Blackhawks over the last several seasons and STILL be under the delusion that Q will only play Rozsival and Mashinter in these incredibly limited roles. Like, every arguing this, you have an amazing ability to convince yourself of absolute bull**** in the name of optimism and fandom. It would be kind of admirable, if it wasn't so sad...
It's insanity. Every summer we hear the same defenses of these nonsense moves, and every year, we've got Rozsival and useless plug X sucking up ice time during the regular season that COULD be used to get a new, young guy with a far higher ceiling acclimated and assimilated.... only for both of Q's toys to inevitably be exposed by the run to the playoffs, leaving the Blackhawks forced to either a) deal assets at the TDL to fill the hole or b) play a reduced roster because those guys Q COULD have acclimated during the drudge of the regular season obviously can't be trusted to get thir first taste of the NHL in the heat of the playoffs.
Some people here just aren't great at pattern recognition, I guess...
I mean, we could have traded Kane.
Terrible character issues, trade him for a Sedin.Well he's overpaid anyway so maybe we should right?
Mash plays a 4th line NHL game. He won't make any terrible TO's but he doesn't do much moving the puck etc, I get that.
Q has shown me a pattern of if he has better guys he plays them.
This is one of the things that I hate about the cap era. Inferior players who play for cheap keep better guys out of the league.
Is there a minimum salary in NHL? Anyway, I will also wait for Stan's call now.
1991 661 skaters dressed for NHL games 31.5 skaters/team
2001 884 skaters dressed for NHL games 29.5 skaters/team
2016 898 skaters dressed for NHL games 29.9 skaters/team
It's about the same, it's just perception.
Is there a minimum salary in NHL? Anyway, I will also wait for Stan's call now.
Pretty sure Mash signed for the minimum.
The overreaction in this thread is typical of some of the spoiled fans. These contracts mean nothing and these players mean nothing in the big picture. These are no risk contracts that add depth. Now I get people have their opinions on if these depth players are needed or if there are better options out there in the system, but these signings do absolutely nothing to hurt the team.
Here's to another year of Monster Mash and Lolzsival!
Is there a minimum salary in NHL? Anyway, I will also wait for Stan's call now.
Who cares? If they suck we send them to Rockford and they count zero against the cap. Only danger is that Q falls in love with them again.