Melrose Munch
Registered User
- Mar 18, 2007
- 23,689
- 2,131
Yes, unfortunately for us the NHL doesn’t want to fix the imbalance in Canada ( 4 teams in the West and 3 in the East). Conspicuously, they didn’t care about this « balance » when Columbus, Florida, Tampa, Atlanta , Carolina and New Jersey were awarded teams.
I know they were the Colorado Rockies/ KC Scouts before. It didn’t matter then to the NHL to allow a move from a Western market to an Eastern one while the imbalance was even worse . I believe it’s the first time in the history of the league that this « we have to balance the conferences » argument is used, and they created this knowingly by moving Detroit and Columbus to the Eastern Conference.
This is true, but the thing is Jacobs (not Bettman) and some of the other owners didnt want Quebec at the time. The NHLPA has also been paying lip service, saying they should have a team, but high profile players will avoid Quebec like they do other smaller canadian markets. There should be push back from the other canadian markets, but apparantly not.I agree with you guys. My point is that the NHL can set up the divisions and conferences any way they like. The alignment can be changed and previously was changed after new teams and markets joined the league, including Winnipeg . The present alignment is built this way simply because Jacobs and others want teams in Seattle, Vegas and Houston( if Arizona has to move). Of course they present it in a seemingly logical way, with the time zones and geography, but you still have one conference that has to deal with 3 time zones. How is that fair? The BoG could think ‘outside the box’ to fix this ( especially if they want to change the playoffs format), but it fits their agenda . I believe this is the first time the alignment has been designed to include future desirable markets.
Last edited: