GDT: Group A • Dec. 31 • Canada vs. USA • Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.

Analyzer*

Guest
You can't review goalie interference in IIHF so idk why people are complaining, it's the rules

It should have been called, or at the very least incidental contact and blown dead.

I think that's what they believe ?
 

Al Lagoon

Registered User
Feb 22, 2012
3,512
668
Fail to see a good goal there when the opponent is all over the goalie in the blue paint, even into the goal.
 

trilobyte

Regulated User
Dec 9, 2008
25,620
3,808
Calgary, Alberta
Some here made the point that interference (if any) was not reviewable.
Even though I was not sure about it anyway, thanks for that reminder.
 

dwanmaster*

Guest
Hometown cooking lol. Oh well it will only make the USA hungrier for the next meetup.

Had Lazar not been there Demko would have caught the puck. Lazar interfered and pushed Demko's glove across the line.

Oh well, that's too be expected when the tournament is in Canada.
 

X66

114-110
Aug 18, 2008
13,578
7,445
Guaranteed if that was USA it'd be no goal.

Lazar made contact with Demko before the puck crossed the line.

Guaranteed, huh?

Demko didn't even flinch or complain after about goalie interference.

USA has no business in this game either, they've been handled 5 on 5.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad