GDT: Group A • Dec. 31 • Canada vs. USA • Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.

MR4

Registered User
Oct 20, 2014
6,270
2,253
You can't review goalie interference in IIHF so idk why people are complaining, it's the rules
 

Weast

Registered User
May 16, 2011
3,112
1,394
The only way that goal shoudn't have counted would be goalie interference, and thats not reviewable
 

Kamiccolo

Truly wonderful, the mind of a child is.
Aug 30, 2011
26,828
16,944
Undisclosed research facility
Seriously. If these kids aren't scoring 5 goals a game then it seems like people think they're all hype.

Nice play by Bowey.

No, I see guys making key plays or almost goals. McDavid has largely been kept to the outside making easy passes.

Points are whatever, but there are other guys who have been much more dangerous.
 

KCC

Registered User
Aug 15, 2007
18,352
9,278
Canada is destroying them. Probably going to end up out shooting them by a 2 to 1 margin.
 

Novak Djokovic

#24 and counting... #GOAT
Dec 10, 2006
23,093
1,324
#1: Goalie interference isn't reviewable

#2: He's allowed to be in the crease

#3: No distinct kicking motion
 

Super Cake

Registered User
Jun 24, 2013
30,998
6,424
You can't review goalie interference in IIHF so idk why people are complaining, it's the rules

You also have to add that it really is impossible to see if it was a good goal or not. None of the angles helped.

If the call on the ice was good goal, don't you need definitive evidence to overturn it? There really wasn't any definitive evidence that it wasn't a goal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad