What grades would you give each individual player thus far into the season, on a scale between 1-10?
Nurse has been one of the best players on the club in his role, yet he almost gets a failing grade or at least a poor grade from almost every poster. He leads the defense in goals, leads in most entry/exit stats, has played tough, hasn't taken a single bad penalty yet, and is the best Dman penalty killer on the #2 ranked PK in the league.
McDavid - 9
Eberle - 6.5
Lucic - 6.5
McDavid has been driving the line. He creates a ton of chances. Wish he would shoot more. Think Eberle been more competitive this year but production is down. Think Lucic is still valuable to this team. Think he probably helps in the dressing room. But production could be more.
RNH - 7
Pou - 5.5
Kassian - 6
RNH has been really good defensively. Makes too much to only be a checking line. Linemates arent helping him all that much. I think Kassian has played his role well, and is doing what is being asked from him.
Draitsatl - 5.5
Maroon - 6.5
Pulju - 5
Draitsatl has been dissapointing I think. Just not doing enough out there. Seems a little too complacent. Maroon plays his role well. Pulju has looked good in stretches, looks clumsy with the puck alot of times but you can tell he thinks the game pretty well and knows where he should be.
Letestu - 7
Pitlick - 6.5
Lander - 5.5
Have lower expectations for fourth line and think they have been better than expected.
Larsson - 7.5
Klefbom - 7
Really like Larssons calmness on back end. His grit has surprised me. Was hoping he would have a bit more offense. I think Klefbom has looked like the best dman on the oilers in games, but hes also had a few too many gaffes with the puck.
Sekera - 6.5
Russell - 6.5
I think both Sekera and Russell have been pretty solid.
Nurse - 6
Gryba - 5
Nurse been really good last few games after a shaky start.
Talbot -9
Outside of Buffalo game he has been really good. Been very strong the last few games.
I'm really close to these numbers.
Nurse has been one of the best players on the club in his role, yet he almost gets a failing grade or at least a poor grade from almost every poster. He leads the defense in goals, leads in most entry/exit stats, has played tough, hasn't taken a single bad penalty yet, and is the best Dman penalty killer on the #2 ranked PK in the league.
Only if you ignore the first 6 games or so where he was one of the worst Oiler's on the ice and only playing against bottom pairing/sheltered minutes. I only decided to give him a 6 last second before I hit Post because his last couple games he has been significantly better... while also being the goat on the second goal against in the Toronto game in a very big way.
Posts like this make me wish I had given him a 4, because if you look at his game over the full 10 we have played so far, there has technically been more bad games than good. If ever so slightly.
Context. Nurse is playing on 3rd pairing in easier minutes. Larsson and Klefbom are doing it against top lines. A good performance from Nurse and a good performance by Larsson arent equal. In his role Nurse gets like a 7 or 8. But for actual impacts on team its a 5.5. Only so much impact you can have on 3rd pairing
He is the top Dman on the PK? Which is 2nd in the league. How's that for context?
Context would mean that you are judging him based on his role and opportunities. Does every student in grade 10 get a failing grade because the content they are learning isn't as difficult as people in grade 12?
My grades are relative to the expectation I had on the player going into the season:
Lucic 4
McDavid 6
Eberle 5
Pouliot 4
RNH 5
Kassian 5
Maroon 5
Draisaitl 5
Puljujarvi 5
Lander 5
Letestu 6
Pitlick 6
Klefbom 6
Larsson 6
Russell 6
Sekera 5
Nurse 7
Gryba 5
Talbot 8
Most players have played at roughly at the level I would have expected. Talbot and Nurse are the two that sticks out in my mind when it comes to performing above my expectations.
He is the top Dman on the PK? Which is 2nd in the league. How's that for context?
Context would mean that you are judging him based on his role and opportunities. Does every student in grade 10 get a failing grade because the content they are learning isn't as difficult as people in grade 12?
My grades are relative to the expectation I had on the player going into the season:
Lucic 4
McDavid 6
Eberle 5
Pouliot 4
RNH 5
Kassian 5
Maroon 5
Draisaitl 5
Puljujarvi 5
Lander 5
Letestu 6
Pitlick 6
Klefbom 6
Larsson 6
Russell 6
Sekera 5
Nurse 7
Gryba 5
Talbot 8
Most players have played at roughly at the level I would have expected. Talbot and Nurse are the two that sticks out in my mind when it comes to performing above my expectations.
The actual results are like a 9 on my scale.Your expectations must have been ridiculous
The actual results are like a 9 on my scale.
I just don't think the performances have matched the results so far. Oilers are running above expectation, and we'll see a correction in the actual results going forward.
Yeah. That's what he said.A guy getting a 95% in grade 10 math is not same as guy getting 70% in University Calculus
No, why would they? I just don't equate the performances with the results.So if the players are playing beyond expectations now are they all going to get failing grades when the team isn't getting 15 out of a possible 20 points anymore?
I expected McDavid to be be one of the best players in the league and he's performing like that, hence the pretty average grade for him relative to my expectation.You do realize that you gave the the best player in the league for the first month of the season a 6/10. A the team is now 4th in GF, almost exclusively scored by forwards, yet you give them all ****** grades?
Yeah. That's what he said.
You argue for context and then refuse to take it into consideration? Seems weird.
I would give Nurse a solid 6.5 trending toward a 7.
And sorry, but McDavid does not deserve a 9 or a 9.5 like some people are grading him here.
Most important grade ... Talbot 8.5.