joe_shannon_1983*
Guest
Chimp said:I don't get it. How does having more players = bad?
More players = more great players
More great players = good
Well it could be argued that teams like Sweden and Finland gelled quicker because they had players who had been playing together their whole lives, and are used to each other. Guys like Forsberg, sundin, Alfreddson, and etc. all have a wealth of experienced playing with one another, and know each other inside and out.
The less players a country has, the less their national team changes, as there is less different player combinations available. This creates familiarity with one another and with the system, familiarity that can be the difference between winning and losing.
A team like Canada didn't have the familiarity that a team like Sweden or Finland had. Canada had many guys who had never played with each other before, or had only played 1-2 times with each other before.
I am not necessarily saying that I agree with this argument. But this is the argument that one could possibly make as it relates to "having more players = bad".