lamp9post
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2007
- 4,427
- 1,704
I don't get this BPA thing and I think you can fall into a trap very quick. Wasn't Puljujarvi and Juolevi best available at 4 and 5 in 2016? If we keep the 3rd pick. I would like to see us draft Zadina, Hughes, or Kotkaniemi. I also like Dobson, Tkachuk, Boqvist, or Wahlstrom but I'm not talking them with the 3rd pick.
Pretty sure the Blue Jackets didn't draft best available when they selected PLD (pre-draft rankings). They went after the guy they wanted that fit into their future plans. The Oilers and Canucks drafted BPA according to popular pre draft rankings. Habs got Sergachev at 9th an the Bruins got McAvoy at 14th.
Throw the BPA out the window and draft Kotkaniemi if our scouts are high on him. I like Zadina a lot too. BPA is a moving target and in 12 months time, the story will be very different with many of these guys in the top 10.
If we think Kotkaniemi has #1C upside, draft him at 3rd. If not, take Zadina or trade down.
If Habs scouts like Kotkaniemi better than Zadina, then he's BPA. When talking about BPA, it's not about deferring to consensus draft rankings, it's about drafting who you project will be the best player.
It doesn't always work out as in the cases you mention (nothing is guaranteed), but I'd be that it works out better than the alternative...especially at the #3 slot.