Habs33
Registered User
HF has them back to back. But who has the higher fantasy value or risk?
and is their anyone not on the top 50 that is better than these two?
and is their anyone not on the top 50 that is better than these two?
Habs33 said:HF has them back to back. But who has the higher fantasy value or risk?
and is their anyone not on the top 50 that is better than these two?
Liquidrage said:Kostitsyn is a much bigger risk IMO since basically even the one's tha rate him very highly will tell you that he's a "tool" guy and his ranking is based on physical ability more then anything.
I really don't care for him, I'm not into the "adjust to the NA game" type thing, so to me, yeah, there's a lot of non top 50 players I'd take ahead of him.
Also, if you're really just thinking "this year" I wouldn't say he's even close to being a given to play in the NHL all year.
Habs33 said:like who are you referring to?
Til the End of Time said:But Kostitsyn missed his girlfriend.
Habs33 said:anyone not on the top 50 that is better than these two?
Liquidrage said:, so to me, yeah, there's a lot of non top 50 players I'd take ahead of him.
Habs33 said:like who are you referring to?
sXe said:
Liquidrage said:I think it's obvious.
Kostitsyn
There's no reason to beat around the bush with this one. You want to think he's a great prospect, that's your right. But based on his play last year he's a much bigger risk.
23 points total in 69 AHL games (including 0 points in 3 playoff games).
Getzlaf went to the AHL for hte playoff run and at least pulled down 5 in 10 walking into a brand new situation.
Based on his play last year, I would consider Kostitsyn to be a much bigger risk. Was it *really* just needing time to adjust to NA that caused that? And if he still needs to *adjust* will he really play a lot in the NHL this year?
Not that people consider him as high as Pitkanen or anything, but Pitkanen scored more in the NHL as a defenseman at the same age having never played in NA before that year. Notice "defenseman", "NHL", "never played in NA before" and "same age".
I just don't really consider the "adjustment period" a valid excuse. Now, I would agree if you say he has great great potential if he does *adjust*. But for the same reason I knocked him in the prospect rankings, I do so here, only here it's plain as day the guy asked about risk. Kostitsyn is a very risky prospect at this point. High risk high reward? That's fine. But very risky IMO if I werea betting man right now.
Liquidrage said:Oh, haha. My bad.
There's two off the Flyers I'd take over him not in th Top 50.
Someone like Patrick Sharp who's a lock to play in the NHL and possibly with good linemates. A point a game in the AHL playoffs and a much much better regular season as well.
Seidenberg. Probably going to get some PP and decent minutes on a very good team.
Really, anyone that is a lock to play in the NHL this year I would take over him. Now, if he's talking keeper league with a longterm view on it, it shortens the numbers I'd take over him because then that risk gets mitigated some.
I'd even take someone like Brad Boyes from Boston over him.
But overall, there's probably dozens of people based on how this question was framed. I just don't think Kostitsyn is going to play a lot in the NHL this year.
Liquidrage said:Kostitsyn is a much bigger risk IMO since basically even the one's tha rate him very highly will tell you that he's a "tool" guy and his ranking is based on physical ability more then anything.
I really don't care for him, I'm not into the "adjust to the NA game" type thing, so to me, yeah, there's a lot of non top 50 players I'd take ahead of him.
Also, if you're really just thinking "this year" I wouldn't say he's even close to being a given to play in the NHL all year.
Im also not sure Jarvis is all that good at developing offensive talent. I would have rather seen Kots played run and gun and develop defensive abilities afterwards so as not to stifle his creativity.montreal said:I agree with the big risk part, but it's more then just adjusting. Kostitsyn was one of the youngest players in the AHL, turing 20 in feb. Didn't speak english, wasn't used to playing in a system, on small ice, had no idea hockey was played at both ends of the rink, was homesick, etc... All just excuses, and to me if he doesn't produce this year it's time to get concerned. (he was one of the top goal scorers on Hamilton, not saying much though since the team really struggled scoring goals especially early in the season)
I don't expect him to play much in the NHL this year, although I would think he'd see a small handful of games if he plays well. The good news for Kostitsyn fans is that the guy made great strides in the progession of his defensive game and play away from the puck, going from being downright clueless in his own end, to actually getting some PK time.
I am not trying to be a Hab homer and say he's great, I was very disappointed with his level of offensive production, despite all the factors. But I was very happy with the progression he made in his all round game, as he slowly learned that he can not go through 5 guys, and that he must stop trying to get through every player.
What gets Hab fans excited was his play at the U-20's, but on the other hand there was his play at the WC's, which was not that impressive from the 2 games I saw at least.
As for where he's ranked and comparing him to others, who cares. It's simple he's got a ton of natural skills but he has not shown he can put it all together. He also has a good base of physical tools, size, speed, skating, shot.
Kots played very well against the yanks.montreal said:I agree with the big risk part, but it's more then just adjusting. Kostitsyn was one of the youngest players in the AHL, turing 20 in feb. Didn't speak english, wasn't used to playing in a system, on small ice, had no idea hockey was played at both ends of the rink, was homesick, etc... All just excuses, and to me if he doesn't produce this year it's time to get concerned. (he was one of the top goal scorers on Hamilton, not saying much though since the team really struggled scoring goals especially early in the season)
I don't expect him to play much in the NHL this year, although I would think he'd see a small handful of games if he plays well. The good news for Kostitsyn fans is that the guy made great strides in the progession of his defensive game and play away from the puck, going from being downright clueless in his own end, to actually getting some PK time.
I am not trying to be a Hab homer and say he's great, I was very disappointed with his level of offensive production, despite all the factors. But I was very happy with the progression he made in his all round game, as he slowly learned that he can not go through 5 guys, and that he must stop trying to get through every player.
What gets Hab fans excited was his play at the U-20's, but on the other hand there was his play at the WC's, which was not that impressive from the 2 games I saw at least.
As for where he's ranked and comparing him to others, who cares. It's simple he's got a ton of natural skills but he has not shown he can put it all together. He also has a good base of physical tools, size, speed, skating, shot.
Habs33 said:HF has them back to back. But who has the higher fantasy value or risk?
and is their anyone not on the top 50 that is better than these two?
Devilsfanatic said:I got Getzlaf for Oliwa and Marshall.......stupid Brian Burke
Bobby Ryan Getzlaf said:In EHM?
As for the question, I'm a bit biased, but I'd take Getzlaf. He was Cincy's best player in the "A" playoffs, and looks to be awesome. Kost, though, has a few question marks.
Devilsfanatic said:haha, NHL 2005. To be fair, I also got Montreal's second and fifth round picks for Bobby Allen when they wanted Travis Zajac and John Madden in their original proposal for that 2nd and 5th, lol
Bobby Ryan Getzlaf said:He's in NHL 2005? I didn't notice that.
Devilsfanatic said:no man, roster updates by people, online.
Habs33 said:HF has them back to back. But who has the higher fantasy value or risk?
and is their anyone not on the top 50 that is better than these two?