It may be a fairly good idea depending on what the actual market for EE turns out to be. If he gets an offer well north of $100 mil, I'd be surprised if the Jays match.
It would be completely in line with everything they've done to date in both Cleveland and Toronto - that is avoiding monster contracts for a single player, and instead choosing to spread the money around for multiple average to good players.
- Shapiro signed Travis Hafner for 4 years, $57MM in 2007. The EE contract will likely be 4 years. There's precedence.
- Reddick is a deteriorating asset, and I'm confident the front-office knows this
- Morales is a flawed asset, and I'm confident the front-office know this
- Both players are fine complimentary pieces signed very early or very late in free agency to value deals. That's all
- The beauty of the Happ deal was that they were purchasing an asset that was upward trending, under valued (perception), and known (health wise) to the org. The beauty of the Estrada deal was that they were purchasing an asset that was under valued (perception), and known (health wise) to the org. What made signing the two of them better than a single signing of Price was not so much the aav saved, but the mitigation in the years committed.
- An EE signing differs because there's far less risk involved with the term
- If I truly wanted to save money, I could sign Jon Jay, platoon him with BJ Upton, trump the production of a Reddick and sign EE.