Blue Jays Discussion: free agency #2: Jays sign Cuban Gurriel Jr 7yr\22 mill, & Kendry Morales 3yr\33 mill)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eyedea

The Legend Continues
Jan 29, 2012
27,535
3,330
Toronto, Ontario
Jeff Passan ‏@JeffPassan 7m7 minutes ago
Toronto's plan is to start Lourdes Gurriel Jr. at shortstop, probably at Double-A. Ultimately, thought is he may end up a corner outfielder.

Urena starts in Buffalo then?

Wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing Urena get more reps around the infield.
 

Garlando

Registered User
May 5, 2014
685
237
Kingston, Ontario
Just to follow up on the MLB.com tool grades on Gurriel that was posted on the last page. This Fangraphs page includes a chart with what a tool grade projects to. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/scouting-explained-the-20-80-scouting-scale/

So with Gurriel being given: Hit: 55 | Power: 50 | Run: 50 | Arm: 55 | Field: 60 by MLB.com

That projects to roughly a .270 AVG with 15-18 HRs with a plus glove up the middle. That's a highly valuable player on the FA market so it seems to me the Jays got a good value contract with little risk at just a $3.1 Million price tag. Well done Atkins/Shapiro
 

ShaneFalco

Registered User
Jul 15, 2012
21,414
15,770
London, On
Jon Morosi tell us that the Blue Jays are ‘showing interest’ in Josh Reddick,but they are waiting for Jose Bautista’s decision on the Qualifying Offer.

Reddick hit .281/.345/.405 with 10 home runs in 115 games, split between the Dodger and the A’s. He’s a left-handed hitter, which is something we could use. He’s likely better than Bautista in right field.

I don’t see why they wouldn’t look at Reddick even if they signed Bautista. It is time Jose was moved from the outfield anyway (and Jose said he was willing to play infield or DH).

The team has made an offer to Edwin Encarnacion, but Edwin wants to field other offers before making a decision. The Astros are rumored to be interested, but it sounds like the Red Sox aren’t talking to him.

I’m happy with the signing of Lourdes Gourriel. I’d imagine he’s most likely going to be playing left field, unless there are more moves ahead.
http://www.bluebirdbanter.com/2016/11/11/13600720/blue-jays-rumors-reddick
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
40,191
40,558


That's an alarming OPS considering his HR totals.

Would it be possible to have both him and EE or is this simply a contingency plan if Edwin signs elsewhere? Because one of them becomes useless in interleague play, or in 3-4 games of a World Series.
 

Cor

I am a bot
Jun 24, 2012
69,648
35,246
AEF
Morales would be DH, and Edwing would be 1B.

Would mean the end of Smoak, so I'm cool with it
 

Nasty Nazem

Come at me Crow!
Apr 5, 2010
28,848
0
Canada
Jays would lose quite a bit of flexibility if they were to sign Morales. He can play the occasional 1B here and there but he is mostly just a DH. But I suppose if they can't sign Edwin and are going to stick with Smoak on the roster, then playing Smoak at 1B and Morales DH makes sense.

It's just... ugh, Smoak.
 

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
43,463
18,889
Toronto, ON
Jays would lose quite a bit of flexibility if they were to sign Morales. He can play the occasional 1B here and there but he is mostly just a DH. But I suppose if they can't sign Edwin and are going to stick with Smoak on the roster, then playing Smoak at 1B and Morales DH makes sense.

It's just... ugh, Smoak.

There should be a lot of upset fans if this what will end up happening. Morales at DH and Smoak at 1B full time? Uhhhh....:help:
 

Bob Barker

Registered User
Jun 2, 2008
1,831
420
Jays would lose quite a bit of flexibility if they were to sign Morales. He can play the occasional 1B here and there but he is mostly just a DH. But I suppose if they can't sign Edwin and are going to stick with Smoak on the roster, then playing Smoak at 1B and Morales DH makes sense.

It's just... ugh, Smoak.

Came here to say this. If it's a contingency plan for no EE, then it's fine, but I think they'd be better served putting their money into the outfield and have DH a bit more open to get JD, Tulo etc off their feet for a half day off now and then.

Edit: Didn't realize Morales isn't serviceable at 1B.
 

Kurtz

Registered User
Jul 17, 2005
10,111
6,989
I can absolutely see Shatkins deciding to split $25 mil/year between Reddick and Morales rather than giving that to EE alone.

Would be similar to bringing in Happ+Estrada instead of Price this past season, and would fit their MO of risk diversification.
 

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
43,463
18,889
Toronto, ON
I can absolutely see Shatkins deciding to split $25 mil/year between Reddick and Morales rather than giving that to EE alone.

Would be similar to bringing in Happ+Estrada instead of Price this past season, and would fit their MO of risk diversification.

But then they will Smoak playing 1B every day? **** right off with that ****. Then you have this DH who is slow as molasses and who does not even hit for enough power. ********.
 

canucksfan100

Registered User
Apr 3, 2007
3,102
179
That's an alarming OPS considering his HR totals.

Would it be possible to have both him and EE or is this simply a contingency plan if Edwin signs elsewhere? Because one of them becomes useless in interleague play, or in 3-4 games of a World Series.
Moralez won't get you any extra bade hits besides HRs. But he will get on base and doesn't strike out a ton
 

Diamond Joe Quimby

A$AP Joffrey
Aug 14, 2010
13,547
2,996
Washington, DC
I can absolutely see Shatkins deciding to split $25 mil/year between Reddick and Morales rather than giving that to EE alone.

Would be similar to bringing in Happ+Estrada instead of Price this past season, and would fit their MO of risk diversification.

That's funny...I think they've shown a bit higher aptitude than to think that is a good idea.

Also, I think those two moves (i.e. Happ\Estrada vs. Price and Reddick\Morales vs. EE) are not the same at all...for several reasons.
 

Kurtz

Registered User
Jul 17, 2005
10,111
6,989
But they they will Smoak playing 1B every day? **** right off with that ****.

That'd be quite tragic for sure...but I can see them addressing that issue by bringing in a guy like Lind in another low-risk medium reward move.
 

Glenn Isildur Healy

Registered User
Oct 8, 2013
4,524
686
CBC Studios
But then they will Smoak playing 1B every day? **** right off with that ****. Then you have this DH who is slow as molasses and who does not even hit for enough power. ********.

Doesn't mean at all that Smoak plays 1B everyday

People need to relax and watch this playout. FA has barely started and people are panicking :laugh:
 

Kurtz

Registered User
Jul 17, 2005
10,111
6,989
That's funny...I think they've shown a bit higher aptitude than to think that is a good idea.

Also, I think those two moves (i.e. Happ\Estrada vs. Price and Reddick\Morales vs. EE) are not the same at all...for several reasons.

It may be a fairly good idea depending on what the actual market for EE turns out to be. If he gets an offer well north of $100 mil, I'd be surprised if the Jays match.

It would be completely in line with everything they've done to date in both Cleveland and Toronto - that is avoiding monster contracts for a single player, and instead choosing to spread the money around for multiple average to good players.
 

Kurtz

Registered User
Jul 17, 2005
10,111
6,989
You know what? If they will just do that then just rebuild already. This is crap, half assed ********.

To be honest, with all of the cap-killing monster contracts around baseball, their risk diversification strategy may not be the worst thing.

In any case, given what Cleveland and Toronto accomplished last season, these guys may have been validated in their approach.
 

Diamond Joe Quimby

A$AP Joffrey
Aug 14, 2010
13,547
2,996
Washington, DC
It may be a fairly good idea depending on what the actual market for EE turns out to be. If he gets an offer well north of $100 mil, I'd be surprised if the Jays match.

It would be completely in line with everything they've done to date in both Cleveland and Toronto - that is avoiding monster contracts for a single player, and instead choosing to spread the money around for multiple average to good players.

- Shapiro signed Travis Hafner for 4 years, $57MM in 2007. The EE contract will likely be 4 years. There's precedence.
- Reddick is a deteriorating asset, and I'm confident the front-office knows this
- Morales is a flawed asset, and I'm confident the front-office know this
- Both players are fine complimentary pieces signed very early or very late in free agency to value deals. That's all
- The beauty of the Happ deal was that they were purchasing an asset that was upward trending, under valued (perception), and known (health wise) to the org. The beauty of the Estrada deal was that they were purchasing an asset that was under valued (perception), and known (health wise) to the org. What made signing the two of them better than a single signing of Price was not so much the aav saved, but the mitigation in the years committed.
- An EE signing differs because there's far less risk involved with the term
- If I truly wanted to save money, I could sign Jon Jay, platoon him with BJ Upton, trump the production of a Reddick and sign EE.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad