When I was in high school, the game collection with Block Dude reigned supreme. But I got bored. During calculus, I spent most of my time making games on the TI-83. First, I re-created Lou Carvello's Putting Challenge. Then I made a simple baseball game including graphics. One person selected a pitch location, and the other player selected a swing location or no swing, and the outcome was determined.
Then over the course of the year, I built around the game. What began as a single pitch with a single outcome became a full inning, where you could play against the AI or against a human opponent, you could steal bases, you could tag from third on a fly ball, and hit the batter. I sold it to two classmates for $2 a piece. I was kind of a big deal.
I still have the calculator with the game, too. One day I'll show it to my kids and they'll tell me it's a piece of ****.
Do you really need a graphing calculator to pass high school math nowadays?
It's not that you need a calculator to learn the concepts or solve the problems, it's just that you need a graphing calculator to do the exercises designed for the graphing calculator.
We never had that kind of exercises, just the ones with pen and paper. I don't know what they are teaching now but I just can't understand what kind of value using graphing calculator brings. Some value to programming teaching maybe, but not math.
We never had that kind of exercises, just the ones with pen and paper. I don't know what they are teaching now but I just can't understand what kind of value using graphing calculator brings. Some value to programming teaching maybe, but not math.
You didn't need one, but it just made calculating graphs and things like that a lot quicker. I never had one in high school.
On second thought, maybe that's a good argument to get one
We never had that kind of exercises, just the ones with pen and paper. I don't know what they are teaching now but I just can't understand what kind of value using graphing calculator brings. Some value to programming teaching maybe, but not math.
Yeah, but at the same time they don't typically teach programming. I think the main thing that they want is to allow students to create and process graphs very quickly, and find intersections and zeros using the calculator as opposed to, say, teaching Newton's method.
You're right, though, it's not really necessary. My guess is that when it was brought in, it was thought that teaching with technology would help prepare students for the 21st century or something like that.
Mathematics isn't about learning how to find intersections quickly, it's about learning logic and problem solving, IMO. Though it's time for a humblebrag: I might look things differently because I have M.Sc. in maths.
Love the GDT. Reminds me of the way I got through College... Playing super mario on the calculator
Yeah, but at the same time they don't typically teach programming. I think the main thing that they want is to allow students to create and process graphs very quickly, and find intersections and zeros using the calculator as opposed to, say, teaching Newton's method.
You're right, though, it's not really necessary. My guess is that when it was brought in, it was thought that teaching with technology would help prepare students for the 21st century or something like that.
Do you really need a graphing calculator to pass high school math nowadays?
In one of my grade 12 math courses, we did several units there were literally:
A) Remember the path on your calculator to enter the correct program.
B) Plug numbers into program.
C) Write answer on test.
D) Profit.
Always thought it was weird. But it meant I didn't really have to work or do any homework. Which was a bonus.
I like university more; math classes moved from needing a TI to do the work, to not being allowed to use one
I like the math I do these days, your basic addition, subtraction, multiplication and division
Love the GDT. Reminds me of the way I got through College... Playing super mario on the calculator