@Fig we won 58% of faceoffs last night. Monahan, Backlund and Ryan were all dominant. Lindholm was bad on draws and Janko was 4/9
First period iirc. They were losing tons of draws early in the game.Hmm... was there a specific period we weren't winning them? I seem to recall there was a lot of "And the Flames lose another draw" announcers either on the radio or something at some point. Maybe in the 2nd period or something?
from a fan with Ty Rattie on their teams top line.....at least derek ryan got lots of ice time to show off his letestu-esque skillset
Didn't you know?? 25 year old Ty Ratttie (49 NHL games - 19 pts) is the next Patrick Kane.from a fan with Ty Rattie on their teams top line.....
at least derek ryan got lots of ice time to show off his letestu-esque skillset
from a fan with Ty Rattie on their teams top line.....
Don't you have a DEL team to get dominated by? Roll tide
We were 11/24 in the first. 7/13 in the second. 15/19 in the thirdHmm... was there a specific period we weren't winning them? I seem to recall there was a lot of "And the Flames lose another draw" announcers either on the radio or something at some point. Maybe in the 2nd period or something?
well if we are being honest here
DEL team > vancouver
This narrative is getting old. It is simply UNTRUE. In Carolina last year, Ryan (among forwards) was 8th in TOI, 8th in PP TOI and 8th in production iirc. pretty much bang on for a 3rd liner. But keep spouting false narratives rather than educating yourself and knowing the real storylol fair enough but peters love ryan and will play him WAY more than he should.
considering the DEL team won against you guys, I guess you can say DEL team > Edmonton toowell if we are being honest here
DEL team > vancouver
lol fair enough but peters love ryan and will play him WAY more than he should.
This narrative is getting old. It is simply UNTRUE. In Carolina last year, Ryan (among forwards) was 8th in TOI, 8th in PP TOI and 8th in production iirc. pretty much bang on for a 3rd liner. But keep spouting false narratives rather than educating yourself and knowing the real story
Eh, it could be worse. We've had over usages of Bartkowski, Brouwer and Chiasson by Gully in previous years. Ryan at least is able to contribute more than those guys did which helps to ensure the 3M line isn't driven into the ground due to over deployment. Worst case scenario, it's just one guy who is overused as opposed to multiple guys overused.
I do think the Oilers should have easily been able to curb stomp DEL something like 13-2 or something, but I'm wondering if they were just putting on a show for the crowd. Playing for the entertainment for it as well as playing not to get hurt.
Pretty sure they still played Mcdavid like 30 mins trying to win that game.
wait you mean to tell me that when a coach juggles his lines, guys will play all over? You see this complaining from every fanbase, they get the idea that a player is a coaches favorite and it snowballs well beyond the reality.I don't think he's completely wrong on that statement. I seem to recall reading that the issue for Ryan in Carolina wasn't that he was played to much in TOI, but that he was deployed all over the lines in ways that some fans felt were unreasonable.
I have a sinking feeling that I will be over Ryan sooner rather than later. Other than FO, is there anything this guy does well?
wait you mean to tell me that when a coach juggles his lines, guys will play all over? You see this complaining from every fanbase, they get the idea that a player is a coaches favorite and it snowballs well beyond the reality.
Sanheim and Gudas were far and away our best defense pairing that period.
I expect to see them being deployed even less than they were that period.
Wouldnt even be surprised to see one of them benched next game.
Sorry wrong thread