No celebrations allowed for OT goals if your teammate passed you the puck.I hate how Laf celebrates like crazy acting like Blackwell didn't set up the play entirely.
Especially when your first career NHL goal is an OT game winner...yeah, can’t be celebrating a moment like that. (more /s)No celebrations allowed for OT goals if your teammate passed you the puck.
/s
I hate how Laf celebrates like crazy acting like Blackwell didn't set up the play entirely.
Hockey's a game where volume in chances, not precision in chances, is what yields success. Players all shoot around the same percentage. Lafreniere missed two easier chances in the third period than his overtime goal. But when you get three chances like that, one is going to go in. Let's see it again next game. I want to see him put forth another good game where he gets on the scoresheet, either with goals or assists. Get a streak going.
Maybe don’t watch the game if you’re gonna hate on a 19 year old scoring his 1st NHL goal which just so happens to be an OT GWG. Christ, Ranger fans really can be the worst sometimes. Never satisfied no matter what happens.
Maybe don’t watch the game if you’re gonna hate on a 19 year old scoring his 1st NHL goal which just so happens to be an OT GWG. Christ, Ranger fans really can be the worst sometimes. Never satisfied no matter what happens.
To be fair I’m named Ed Jovanovski for some odd reasonHabs fan who's named ryan callahan for some odd reason
Iam not a Ranger fan either obviously a Sabre fan but give the kid a break.Congrats kid and going to a have a great career,Ranger fans enjoy him he is going to be a beautyI don't think he's a rangers fan.
Iam not a Ranger fan either obviously a Sabre fan but give the kid a break.Congrats kid and going to a have a great career,Ranger fans enjoy him he is going to be a beauty
Yes he still isn't at his best battling a shoulder injury but thank you.You guys got a ton of young talent.Good luck!I don't get to watch a lot of Eichel, but seeing these last two games...man he is good. Hope he stays with you guys.
Like I’m called AlexisLafreniere for some odd reason.To be fair I’m named Ed Jovanovski for some odd reason
Not even close. Daigle was not interested in playing hockey He only played for the money. If Lafreniere fails it will be becasue his coach is an idiot.Looks like another daigle situation to me...
Doesnt look like a 1st overall pick to me at all. Sorry but thats what I see so far.Not even close. Daigle was not interested in playing hockey He only played for the money. If Lafreniere fails it will be becasue his coach is an idiot.
Looks like another daigle situation to me...
I'm sorry but kakko also hasn't really impressed me at being number 2 overall. Both currently are struggling. Its early yes but its concerning. Will see how it goes as the season progresses.Daigle had 51 points in his first season. Are you suggesting Lafreniere's going to score the equivalent (over 56 games)?
Calling Lafreniere a bust because he only has 1 point in 8 games is a little ridiculous. He's had some bad puck luck. His OISH% (all situations) is third worst on the team (4.76%) in front of two guys who are at 0%, so he's been unfortunate. He should have 3 or 4 points even with regular fortune. And then obviously if he had that, you wouldn't begin to suggest what you are.
Didn't you also claim the same thing about Kakko? Kakko's already been playing better this season and showing improvement from last season. His work off the puck and ability to process the speed of the NHL game is much better. Even if Kakko doesn't become a 2OA caliber of player (not something I'd concede at this point), making too much during a player's rookie season is foolish. Lafreniere was picked 1OA for a reason. Even if he doesn't become anywhere near as good as advertised (not something anyone should be conceding at this point), he's likely to see improvement in upcoming seasons and get a lot better. He's also playing better than Kakko did last season, and actually looks like he belongs.
Something else people like you don't realize because you aren't familiar enough with the Rangers is that we can't afford to give these high picks free ice time and situations like most teams that pick in that range do. We have established good NHL'ers in front of these guys and we are trying to win games. There might be some teams where Kakko last season and Lafreniere this season would've gotten top six/first PP/18-20 minutes per game, regardless of how they were playing, because those teams weren't worried about winning and didn't have viable options for their roles, if they weren't getting those roles. For our team, it's not going to work like that. I think the team could do a better job of developing Lafreniere and Kakko, but they aren't going to be put in a situation that they would on Detroit or Ottawa or New Jersey.
I'm sorry but kakko also hasn't really impressed me at being number 2 overall. Both currently are struggling. Its early yes but its concerning. Will see how it goes as the season progresses.
Kakko has 2 points in 8 games. Let’s pump the breaksDaigle had 51 points in his first season. Are you suggesting Lafreniere's going to score the equivalent (over 56 games)?
Calling Lafreniere a bust because he only has 1 point in 8 games is a little ridiculous. He's had some bad puck luck. His OISH% (all situations) is third worst on the team (4.76%) in front of two guys who are at 0%, so he's been unfortunate. He should have 3 or 4 points even with regular fortune. And then obviously if he had that, you wouldn't begin to suggest what you are.
Didn't you also claim the same thing about Kakko? Kakko's already been playing better this season and showing improvement from last season. His work off the puck and ability to process the speed of the NHL game is much better. Even if Kakko doesn't become a 2OA caliber of player (not something I'd concede at this point), making too much during a player's rookie season is foolish. Lafreniere was picked 1OA for a reason. Even if he doesn't become anywhere near as good as advertised (not something anyone should be conceding at this point), he's likely to see improvement in upcoming seasons and get a lot better. He's also playing better than Kakko did last season, and actually looks like he belongs.
Something else people like you don't realize because you aren't familiar enough with the Rangers is that we can't afford to give these high picks free ice time and situations like most teams that pick in that range do. We have established good NHL'ers in front of these guys and we are trying to win games. There might be some teams where Kakko last season and Lafreniere this season would've gotten top six/first PP/18-20 minutes per game, regardless of how they were playing, because those teams weren't worried about winning and didn't have viable options for their roles, if they weren't getting those roles. For our team, it's not going to work like that. I think the team could do a better job of developing Lafreniere and Kakko, but they aren't going to be put in a situation that they would on Detroit or Ottawa or New Jersey.
They are borderline busts right now and not even close to playing where they got picked. I stand by that statement . Let's see if they prove me wrong.The point is that you said the same thing last year about Kakko. He’s clearly getting better. Asserting that Lafreniere will be a bust 8 games in is ridiculous. Give these kids some time. I don’t have an issue with criticizing their play and I do so, but comparing them directly to busts is ridiculous at this point.