Liver King
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2016
- 7,449
- 5,285
My point was 1.5 yrs of EK before UFA doesn't get a top 10 C like Mark who is signed for 8 yrs at a extremely good contract. So my point still stands.
Could EK land a top 10 C with a similar contract status & age as EK? Yes of course, but that's not was being debated.
But the 2nd point is and should be debated as that is the realistic scenario - separating them is irrational. However, I do believe the unrealistic scenario where "pure rental Karlsson" is moved he is still worth a legit #1 - just without additions.
there is NO realistic scenario where Karl is traded as a pure rental. NONE. You either trade the big assets confident you will sign him, or you trade the big assets with a contract in place.
He is not getting these shit returns being thrown around if he is traded tomorrow or next year. In all scenarios Kalrsson is worth elite top end players - I get Schiefele is not available - but a young top end center is still completely fair value in any scenario
Last edited: