Mobiandi
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2015
- 21,117
- 17,601
Hopefully he gets 3rd pairing money and nothing over 2MCeci was amazing to start the year. It was legitimately shocking how good he was for the first half of the season. Then he regressed back into the normal Ceci when his minutes got bumped up. He was heinous to end the season and really hurt Matheson in the playoffs.
If you want Ceci to be good, him being anything above a bottom pair D for you is a mistake.
So 3rd pair guy for sure? No upward potential?Ceci was amazing to start the year. It was legitimately shocking how good he was for the first half of the season. Then he regressed back into the normal Ceci when his minutes got bumped up. He was heinous to end the season and really hurt Matheson in the playoffs.
If you want Ceci to be good, him being anything above a bottom pair D for you is a mistake.
You guys needed a 1st or 2nd pairing shutdown defenseman. You had plenty of 3rd pairing guys already. Him and Keith together would be pretty funny.Hopefully he gets 3rd pairing money and nothing over 2M
The guy is same age as RNH and Koekkoek.. the word potential doesn't fly anymoreSo 3rd pair guy for sure? No upward potential?
Yup, he wouldn't/shouldnt be the only add at RD.You guys needed a 1st or 2nd pairing shutdown defenseman. You had plenty of 3rd pairing guys already.
What a train wreck of an off season for Holland
The D market looks like its crazy expensive. Wish the Flames hadn't traded or lost 4 top pairing defensemen in the past 4 years.Yup, he wouldn't/shouldnt be the only add at RD.
I feel like people just repeat this because it's the popular fad right now