ECQF Game 2: Columbus (WC1) at Washington (1) 7:30 PM ET | SN360, TVAS2, NBCSN, NBCSWA, FS-O

[Ace Rothstein]

He's onside.

 

[dechire]

Onside imo. He dragged his toe.

 

[Ragamuffin Gunner]

way to not show any replays nbc

 

[Tifosi]

No goal, offside.

 

[Do Make Say Think]

Looks offside to me

 

[Dumais]

wtf?

 

[Pengwins]

i dont get it, its clearly onsides imo

 

[PrototypeX85]

If the NHL claims to find conclusive evidence and overturns the call, this is rigged.

 

[Nadal On Clay]

Onside

 

[syz]

Not going to be anything they can call conclusively.

 

[roflstomper]

Clearly onside. Shouldn't be taking this long.

 

[Adrianopolous]

I think it's offside

 

[apollo71426]

Too close, no way they can reverse that.

Anyways, Orpik coughs it up behind the net. Absolute joke.

 

[Alexei Yashvalev]

That's pretty close.

 

[StrangeVision]

Good call.

 

[Cletus Marley]

Lol. Trotz just dropped a load in his pants.

 

[Firsov99]

If they overturn it, Torts will explode.

 

[Hockey4Lyfe]

You can’t overturn that from the angles given on TV.

And it’s not.

 

[CBJFan19*]

Game. Ova.

 

[PrototypeX85]

NHL gets it right. Well, getting it right would be getting rid of offsides challenges but whatever.

 

[KCbus]

 

[ncm7772]

Dominate. Find a way to lose. Typical Caps.

Not trying to talk smack, that's just how it is.

 

[NeelyWasAWarrior]

This is silly that we're reviewing these off sides calls. This is not what the rule makers had in mind.

Goal stands. Good comeback for CBJ.

 

[The Jones Zone]

Trotz doesn't want to leave the bench, knows He may never see it again

 

[Samuel Culper III]

I say onside. But after last years SCF who can predict how these calls go and what constitutes “conclusive”. Trotz is gonna get fired.