That's why games are won on the ice, not a calculator and decimal points.
Few questions. Who determines when a "scoring chance" or "high danger scoring chance" has occurred? What is the difference between the 2? Would the Caps being the home team 2 out of 3 (66.6666%) games possibly affect these number in any way?
I find it interesting that the "high danger scoring chance" numbers are by far the most lopsided, and it happens to be the number that is the most affected by outside interpretation. 36-17 doesn't seem accurate to me. But that leaves us a couple more questions about these "high danger" scoring chances or scoring chances in general. Game 3, the CBJ hit how many posts? 4...5? Literally. Were all these considered "high danger" scoring chances let alone regular scoring chances? 17 is 5.6666 "high danger" chances a game. Less than 2 a period AND that's NOT including OT. Doesn't add up.
What about this goal? Dreaded wrist shot, definitely not a "high danger" area right? If it didn't go in, would it even be considered a "scoring chance"? IF this missed the net it would barely register statistically in any way. It was a key goal to win a game.
As has been noted by MANY, the CBJ's 1st line, and most importantly ARTEMI PANARIN have been eating your team up 5 on 5. I'll trust what my eyes see. WASH outplayed the CBJ in game 2 though, congrats.