xxsciroccoxx
Registered User
- Dec 17, 2010
- 270
- 208
Imagine being up 3-1 in the playoffs and losing in 7?Imagine a lineup of Domi, Drouin, Suzuki, Caufield, Gallagher? It would have to be the smallest top 6 in NHL history.
Imagine being up 3-1 in the playoffs and losing in 7?Imagine a lineup of Domi, Drouin, Suzuki, Caufield, Gallagher? It would have to be the smallest top 6 in NHL history.
Imagine a lineup of Domi, Drouin, Suzuki, Caufield, Gallagher? It would have to be the smallest top 6 in NHL history.
Suzuki is 210 pounds. Drouin is 205.Imagine a lineup of Domi, Drouin, Suzuki, Caufield, Gallagher? It would have to be the smallest top 6 in NHL history.
I prefer small players with grit to big and soft perimeter players... we've had a classic example for years with Pacioretty. Perhaps you can relate too.Imagine a lineup of Domi, Drouin, Suzuki, Caufield, Gallagher? It would have to be the smallest top 6 in NHL history.
Just a quick reminder that Eklund has a well deserved reputation for making up rumors. Consider the source. He's got a long, long, long track record of incorrect insider information.
The Eklund tag on HF is there, not to legitimize him, but to warn posters to avoid the discussion if they so desire.
I can't be clearer than that without breaking site rules.
Reputations are often like rumours. May or may not be reflection of what is. We have Spector saying that Eklund has a good pulse on what is being talked about. Eklund reports rumours. that is what he does. One needs to that in context. Most trade talks do not go through for what ever reasons.I did note the word "rumor". I specifically said he has a reputation for making up "rumours".
Even outside hockey, rumors are often made up just to get attention.
That's only 5 players.Imagine a lineup of Domi, Drouin, Suzuki, Caufield, Gallagher? It would have to be the smallest top 6 in NHL history.
Tries to troll Montreal fansIt’s funny you took offence to what I said, I didn’t say there was anything wrong with it. But in classic fashion you attack me strictly because I’m a leafs fan.
Imagine a lineup of Domi, Drouin, Suzuki, Caufield, Gallagher? It would have to be the smallest top 6 in NHL history.
Daymmn sire. That would be true. Like woah. They ain't doing that there sire, not at all. Good team still though, I aint' saying it like that at all sire.Imagine a lineup of Domi, Drouin, Suzuki, Caufield, Gallagher? It would have to be the smallest top 6 in NHL history.
Eklund saying that Vegas and Eichel are close is hilarious when Vegas still has to get under the salary cap.
Not for the Blue Jackets. Domi is more likely to be useful, and if he isn't will be out after this year. Drouin has little or no hope of being useful and we'd be stuck with him for an additional year beyond.Wouldn’t any trade for Domi see Drouin going back though?
Maybe the Eklund rumour us just making a logical connection?
Domi for Drouin kind of makes sense.
Tell us you don't follow what the Blue Jackets do without saying you don't follow what the Blue Jackets do.after trading Anderson and PLD for Domi and Laine (who have been making negative headlines since they were acquired) that GM should be canned. Two rough and tumble guys who play to win versus two perimeter players with egos. fml
I follow the habs and jets though lolNot for the Blue Jackets. Domi is more likely to be useful, and if he isn't will be out after this year. Drouin has little or no hope of being useful and we'd be stuck with him for an additional year beyond.
* * *
Tell us you don't follow what the Blue Jackets do without saying you don't follow what the Blue Jackets do.
Cool. That does, however, fail to actually address the "lack of useful information" issue.I follow the habs and jets though lol
LOl.......you would think leaf fans like this, would maybe lay a little lower these days...Imagine being up 3-1 in the playoffs and losing in 7?
Imagine a lineup of Domi, Drouin, Suzuki, Caufield, Gallagher? It would have to be the smallest top 6 in NHL history.
I think it's less "because you're a Leafs fan" and more "because you came into a thread about Montreal and made a comment of a type that has long been used to troll Habs fans about their roster". The only thing your Leafs affiliation affects is how folks are retaliating.It’s funny you took offence to what I said, I didn’t say there was anything wrong with it. But in classic fashion you attack me strictly because I’m a leafs fan.
This is more made up than usual
Kekalainen would not do this. A GMs job is built around optics. The best optics is to win a lot of games, but there are other concerns. You dont trade Anderson for Domi, and then trade Domi back to the same team for a reduced value. It just looks awful. It gives your haters too juicy a narrative