dalewood12
Registered User
- Oct 9, 2017
- 1,292
- 1,267
The consensus is that it is a close three way race for the Hart Trophy. Does the eventual Hart winner also win the Lindsay?
They're not even voted on by the same group of people.No , Lindsay will be the consolation prize
They should both be MacKinnon.
Mackinnon didn't have a historic season. Kuch had.
Kucherov deserves both this year based on what he did, and how his team compared on production.
He had a better season. I'm not just giving it to Kucherov on the basis of having 100 assists, especially in a season where somebody else did too.Mackinnon didn't have a historic season. Kuch had.
Based on what? He lost Art Ross to Kuch. Didn't have a margin between himself & his teammate as Kuch did.He had a better season. I'm not just giving it to Kucherov on the basis of having 100 assists, especially in a season where somebody else did too.
I feel really strongly about Ross winner also winning the hart, and have said that for the past 3-4 months when it seemed we had a historic race on hand. That's what I think should happen.
Lindsay? I feel a bit less strongly about.
But....who else is going to win? McDavid is definitely the best player - so sticking to that simple logic, players could vote for him - he probably didn't have the best season, but he is the best player. Or players might vote for Mack because they feel he's "due" (and also great)...but I'm actually going to keep it simple and predict Kucherov sweeps all 3 of Ross/Hart/Lindsay
So I voted yes
Of course he did.
They both did.
Only 4 players other than Kuch had 100 assists in NHL history: Gretzky, Lemieux, Orr & McDavid.
Highest assists any winger ever had was 87. Kuch has 100 this year.
It's based on the fact that the Avalanche are +33 at 5v5 with MacKinnon on the ice and -11 without him.Based on what? He lost Art Ross to Kuch. Didn't have a margin between himself & his teammate as Kuch did.
Didn't score 70 goals ore had 100 assists.
This is opinion is based on nothing at all.
Mackinnon didn't have a historic season. Kuch had.
It's based on the fact that the Avalanche are +33 at 5v5 with MacKinnon on the ice and -11 without him.
For all his scoring, the Lightning are only +5 with Kucherov on the ice.
-22What was the Lighting goal differential at 5v5 without Kucherov on the ice?