Yes. Next game. Don't know who comes out, but he'll be in there I would think. He is, plainly, a better hockey player than a few of the guys on our roster, and it would thus help the team to have him in the lineup. He's also had a few days now with the team to practice and learn the system, and he's been able to watch a game from the press-box.
I originally thought Granlund was the easy choice, but then he pots 2 last night. Maybe scratch Raymond and move Granlund to the wing.
I'd expect so. Otherwise they would have sent him down to the AHL where he'd get the minutes he needs.
I originally thought Granlund was the easy choice, but then he pots 2 last night. Maybe scratch Raymond and move Granlund to the wing.
He scored two last night, but he still isn't ideal as an NHL centre. I feel like he's flagged as the season has gone on. Just goes for games without anything happening while he's on the ice. Although to be fair his defensive game is very sound.
He still gave the team much-needed insurance goals so he's earned the next game. If Bennett slots into the lineup, it should be at the expense of Colborne or Raymond.
Unless he's a lot worse in practice than they were expecting, you're right. But that would be silly given they had him in practice earlier in the year, too. And in TC. They should know what they're getting.
Honestly, it'd be a bit hard to sit someone for Bennett after the game against Edmonton. The suspects you'd imagine: Colborne, Ferland, Joorie, Granlund & Raymond; all had decent games. I don't think you could justify sitting any of them in favor of an 18 year old.
Earned, never given.
People really don't pay attention to these thingsHe arrived in town at 1:30 AM Saturday - likely the only reason he didn't dress against the Oilers.
Raymond didn't have a decent game. He wasn't even able to do his buttonhook without losing the puck, and he had a few egregious defensive-zone turnovers.