How many new fans NHL got by this? Just think.
kinda crazy that you even had to point this out, seems obvious that there is a big difference between getting hurt in the Olympics vs getting hurt in the NHL.But Matthews got injured while playing for the franchise that pays him. If you work for company A, and get hurt while doing it, that's one thing. If you work for company A, but get hurt while doing the same job for free for some other entity that doesn't compensate your employer, but you still get paid by your employer while you're out, how long is that going to work?
Ok if we’re saying that it will help the NHL grow the game, why not let them use highlights and footage of the games? That’s not helping grow the game either.People saying Olympics are not giving anything in return but that is simply just not true. It introduces hockey to the world in the way that nothing else comes close to. You're not getting that publicity to the sport worldwide with any money. 500 million viewer average of Winter Olympic events is something that nothing comes close to. You might say that is not giving anything to NHL but the sport only. That would be also false while NHL being the top of the iceberg of this sport and the worldwide attention has always great effects that mostly benefits the top of the iceberg in the end. This is publicity, new fans of sport, new national and international viewers for the sport and in the end all this will result as big money to the pockets of NHL. This means in the end NHL is now cutting of it's own leg bit by bit.
There is ONE Team USA, so the whole country is watching. Comparing that to a game between 2 local teams is dumb. All you need to do is show how the NHL benefitted. Show us the spike in ratings following the Olympics. Show us the spike in merchandise sales. Show us the spike in ticket sales or the spike on prices on the secondary market for the teams that sell out following the Olympics. Simply saying, "It introduces hockey to the World..." or "500million people watch..." has not meant anything to the NHL. I see it at work alone. I started working in my current job in 2003. Leading up the 06, 10, and 14 games the people who do not follow hockey would ask me about the guys in the Olympics. They watched, and as soon as it was over, they stopped watching hockey for 4 years. People watch the Olympics as it brings out a sense of patriotism. Not just hockey, but most of the sports. Most people do not care about gymnastics, swimming, track and field, figure skating, skiing, except for the Olympics.People saying Olympics are not giving anything in return but that is simply just not true. It introduces hockey to the world in the way that nothing else comes close to. You're not getting that publicity to the sport worldwide with any money. 500 million viewer average of Winter Olympic events is something that nothing comes close to. You might say that is not giving anything to NHL but the sport only. That would be also false while NHL being the top of the iceberg of this sport and the worldwide attention has always great effects that mostly benefits the top of the iceberg in the end. This is publicity, new fans of sport, new national and international viewers for the sport and in the end all this will result as big money to the pockets of NHL. This means in the end NHL is now cutting of it's own leg bit by bit.
For hockey fans like me it introduces some of the greatest players of hockey ever combined in lines and teams. And most likely these teams like USA, Canada, Russia and Sweden are the best teams ever in the name of the sport. Who Real hockey fan would not like to see this happening? You are crazy I say, if you don't think that this not worth it. Then people say but hey - World cup, we have the world cup of hockey. Then it gets back to the first point I've made. Worldwide publicity. Only people to watch the World Cup are those that are already interested in the sport and the benefits of this event for the sport are very questionable.
So. As a true ice hockey fan I DO CARE BIG TIME that NHL is not going to the Olympics. It's is a very bad decision for the whole sport, not just to the mighty NHL.
edit: Ratings say people do care. Compare this to Stanley Cup finals figures.
"Canada's victory against Team USA in the Olympic gold-medal game Sunday night was the most-watched hockey game in the United States in 30 years. "
Olympic final most-watched hockey game in 30 years
How many new fans NHL got by this? Just think.
Just like me and hopefully many people more. Until the NHL stops sabotaging international hockey they won't see a penny from me.Yes. I have not paid for anything NHL-related this season.
Yes. I have not paid for anything NHL-related this season.
Well, the salary cap is reportedly going up next season, so I do not think they are worried about your penny. BTW, how much did you spend per year over the last 5 years?Just like me and hopefully many people more. Until the NHL stops sabotaging international hockey they won't see a penny from me.
Don't like the NHL, then don't support it. but that isnt going to make international hockey any better. and if you are looking for saboteurs, direct your eyes towards the IOC.Just like me and hopefully many people more. Until the NHL stops sabotaging international hockey they won't see a penny from me.
As lame as the Olympics are, they were always SUPPOSED to be a multi-sport thing for amateurs. That's how it used to be, and that's how it should be. Sending millionaire star athletes over to steal amateur medals has always been dumb.
But Matthews got injured while playing for the franchise that pays him. If you work for company A, and get hurt while doing it, that's one thing. If you work for company A, but get hurt while doing the same job for free for some other entity that doesn't compensate your employer, but you still get paid by your employer while you're out, how long is that going to work?
And the point isn't the Islanders or Tavares specifically. All of the players in the Olympics are susceptible to injury. Most players don't get hurt playing a regular season game either. I'm constantly amazed that there aren't more skate blade related injuries, because legs are flying all over the place, but how many long term injuries are there even with 3rd and 4th line scrubs relative to the number of players and games involved? And there aren't that many injuries in the Olympics. It's not the number though, it's that it can happen in an exhibition that isn't tied to the player's contract. If the players want the Olympics so bad, guarantee it in the next CBA, even if they have to shut the league down for a year. If you leave the choice up to the owners/league, they're going to do what they feel is in their best interest. If they feel the risk outweighs the reward, for whatever reason, then you're not going.
Although I suppose the players could get together and go if they wanted to. Just stage a walk-out. I'm down for some chaos.
For all the whining and complaints from the players do fans actually care?
I'm glad that they aren't, don't care about Canada at international tournaments (unpopular mindset probably). And I'm glad that it doesn't delay the season and risk injury to the leagues biggest stars.
The idea of whether the owners are getting a great deal - as your #1 concern is simply ridiculous. If you're worried more about the financial well-being of NHL owners more than being able to watch a best-on-best tournament of hockey players around the world representing their country... I don't know what to say. Forbes has a website - I'd think you'd be on there. The players will go risk their careers for free but - you're worried about the owners bottom line? Insurance payments? Having to rent hotel rooms? (y'know they stay at Olympic Villages?) Food (once again - Olympic villages) and that the owners still would've gotten 82 games.
Off chance someone gets hurt and they have to pay their insurance premiums.
By not watching with baited breath what amounts to who wins an ugliest dog show?So the concern here is the owners? Welp better start moving American teams that are essentially dead weight and money losers for the majority of owners who have to socialize their losses. Oh wait, now we get into the "b-but, players have been developed watching those teams, AUSTON MATTHEWS!!!" argument which could easily be used for the Olympic argument as well.
It's just pathetic is all, I would expect more solidarity between the fans in desiring to watch the best compete against each other, blows my mind that some people don't want to see this and the BEST reasons they can come up with are protecting those poor old billionaire owners who might lose out on a very small percentage of profits!
I just cannot and will not ever get it, the anti nationalism crowd is hilarious too, Olympic nationalism is the most benign and pointless form of nationalism around (if you can even call it that), but poor snowflakes have to deal with a bit of flag waving for a few weeks, how will they cope???
The NHL acts like the IOC owes NHL anything. It doesn't. The NHL os just alocal league, just like any other league. They are not entitled to any special treatment.Don't like the NHL, then don't support it. but that isnt going to make international hockey any better. and if you are looking for saboteurs, direct your eyes towards the IOC.
First of all that's not of your business. And then you obviously don't undestand basic economics. Obviously they can survive one fan dropping out, Regardless of how much he/she spends. There is also a big chunk about marketing and how the league fools youinto believeing they sell you a quality product. They don't. The quality isdecreasing for quitesome time. For them it is only a business obviously. That is why disgust is what describes my feelings towards the league/owners. As long as those... people are making mney by selling people junkfood-hockey, they won't care about hockey or development of the game or whatever. The last thing I will do is spending moneon their product. If I can spend money somewhere on hurting the NHL, I will.Well, the salary cap is reportedly going up next season, so I do not think they are worried about your penny. BTW, how much did you spend per year over the last 5 years?
And what do you base this assumption on? The miracle on ice happened and now all olympic tournaments should be based on this anomaly? It's kind of ironic you want only amateurs to compete, but not the millionaires. Well, historically, it was "amateurs" in the form of upper class aristocrats that mainly competed, because they were the only ones rich enough and with enough spare time to be really good in a sport. They were rich enough they didn't have to get paid to perform their sport.As lame as the Olympics are, they were always SUPPOSED to be a multi-sport thing for amateurs. That's how it used to be, and that's how it should be. Sending millionaire star athletes over to steal amateur medals has always been dumb.
Yeah they are just a local league, a local league with the overwhelming majority of the best players on the planet. A local league? Man that's rich.The NHL acts like the IOC owes NHL anything. It doesn't. The NHL os just alocal league, just like any other league. They are not entitled to any special treatment.