Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - offseason edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

Camille the Eel

Registered User
Cirelli is one of the best defensive forwards in the league. He is not a depth player.
He’s also very likely capable of producing a good deal more offensively if put in a role that demanded it. First class 2 way center, he is and relatively young I believe.

It actually happens all the time. Go find Larsson scouting reports "smooth skating", "excellent skater"....tons of it. It was simply wrong.

So many scouting reports I've seen over the years will say a poor skater is good... most often usually "for a big man"

Scouts have a long history of missing skating issues I don't know why...I saw Dylan McIlrath one game at Traverse City and a made small comment here(main board) that "that kid can't skate"...out flew all the scouting quotes "moves well for a big man", "powerful stride"....no, those reports were all wrong.

If I really sit down and think about it I bet I find a dozen examples of obviously poor skaters with scouts saying how good they skate predraft...I think it's largely an effect of watching the players against mostly other poor skaters in lower leagues and never seeing the deficiencies until the player is tested against better players.
Scouting is only as good as the scouts judgment. They aren’t all created equal or you wouldn’t have these misjudgments. A good GM or personnel director himself has good judgment about who’s judgment he trusts.
 

Oneiro

Registered User
Mar 28, 2013
9,443
11,011
Skating is one of those discussions I find incredibly disingenuous from every analyst, Button, Pronman, etc. to posters on this board.

You know what good to great skating looks like - Fowler, Hughes, etc. It's unfair because it excludes most players but that benchmark should always be at the forefront when discussing prospects because most of them don't meet it - but they're going on to play in a league where the durable players often do. Completely agree that pre-draft skating reports are some of the biggest BS you've ever read.
 

Poppy Whoa Sonnet

J'Accuse!
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2007
7,302
7,722
Genuinely surprised by the results of this poll:


I voted Stevens but only because I may have been brainwashed by Brodeur is a Fraud, certainly didn't expect Brodeur to run away with it.
 

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
13,620
17,247
Genuinely surprised by the results of this poll:


I voted Stevens but only because I may have been brainwashed by Brodeur is a Fraud, certainly didn't expect Brodeur to run away with it.

Broduer, Stevens, Elias in that top 3
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devs3cups

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,165
28,503
Stevens changed the franchise. When he came to NJ it was like switch had been flipped.

Brodeur is the best in franchise history...but I'm not 100% sure he achieves the heights he did without Stevens.

Stevens was a truly special player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeedsMonster

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
71,943
44,537
PA


We’re told by one informant that New Jersey may attempt to jump the process by dealing for the 30-year-old’s rights if the Maple Leafs cannot or will not extend the netminder, who started more than 26 games (47) in a season for the first time in his career.

The idea would be to move Mackenzie Blackwood, whose career has somehow careened off course during a couple of drama-filled seasons this fragile team does not need. It also does not need an older veteran coming off injuries to serve as the backup; e.g., Corey Crawford; Jonathan Bernier.

We’re hearing as well that the Devils could have interest in Alex Georgiev if he becomes unrestricted this summer, but likely as part of a tandem operation rather than as a No. 1.

It is unlikely that the Blueshirts would send No. 40’s rights to New Jersey without an overpay, though if Michael McLeod becomes part of the conversation, I’d be all in.
 

glenwo2

LINDY RUFF NEEDS VIAGRA!!
Oct 18, 2008
52,056
24,344
New Jersey(No Fanz!)




No real news other than at least we're not losing Bryce to a coaching job it would seem, although I wouldn't mind him on our bench :P

He is not interested in doing PbP? Weird considering his recent statement here :

“I don’t have a passion for coaching,” Salvador said. “I like the business side of the game –– the hockey operations, the player development. I’ve always gravitated towards that. There might be a combination of that tied in with the broadcasting."

“I don’t have a definitive end game here. I really enjoy the broadcasting and slowly adding more involvement with the Devils and looking to do more things with them.”



I'm guessing he's just enjoying where he is right now and will look to move on if the opportunity presents itself here in the organization.

Too bad, though.

He would've made a hell of a coach.
 

RSeen

Registered User
Oct 26, 2011
6,655
1,970
Toronto
From a team building perspective, if we can get Severson on a reasonable deal, it could make sense to keep him.

Having a potential shut-down pair with him and Siegs could be invaluable playoff time, similar to how Tampa plays Mcdonagh-Cernak, letting Hedman play weaker competition and getting more offensive zone starts.

Could allow us to roll out L. Hughes and Dougie in more offensive situations at even strength.

I'm not sure I'd want Dougie to have to be in a situation where he has to play shut-down minutes...Severson proved he is capable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billdo

Billdo

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
19,466
16,337
Ocean County
From a team building perspective, if we can get Severson on a reasonable deal, it could make sense to keep him.

Having a potential shut-down pair with him and Siegs could be invaluable playoff time, similar to how Tampa plays Mcdonagh-Cernak, letting Hedman play weaker competition and getting more offensive zone starts.

Could allow us to roll out L. Hughes and Dougie in more offensive situations at even strength.

I'm not sure I'd want Dougie to have to be in a situation where he has to play shut-down minutes...Severson proved he is capable.
I really think it would be a smart move to sign him. We've got to improve the D as a whole and losing him creates another void to fill with absolutely nothing internally.
 

RSeen

Registered User
Oct 26, 2011
6,655
1,970
Toronto
I really think it would be a smart move to sign him. We've got to improve the D as a whole and losing him creates another void to fill with absolutely nothing internally.
People underrate his defensive game because historically he has made big glaring errors but he is very good in that area. He can also move the puck well and continue to help in the transition game.

He would be very difficult to replace. I think we need to keep him and try to get him for a 6 year term though he could require a 7 year contract.
 

Saugus

Ecrasez l'infame!
Jun 17, 2009
105,039
12,314
Connecticut
Genuinely surprised by the results of this poll:


I voted Stevens but only because I may have been brainwashed by Brodeur is a Fraud, certainly didn't expect Brodeur to run away with it.

The only correct answer to that poll is Brodeur. Marty and the Devils are virtually synonymous to anybody who watched hockey at any point during the 90s or 2000s.
 

Bleedred

Travis Green BLOWS! Bring back Nasreddine!
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
130,165
57,503
Where is the Georgiev stuff coming from?

Honestly, I don't think he's any better than Blackwood, so I'd rather just keep Blackwood.
 

Billdo

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
19,466
16,337
Ocean County
People underrate his defensive game because historically he has made big glaring errors but he is very good in that area. He can also move the puck well and continue to help in the transition game.

He would be very difficult to replace. I think we need to keep him and try to get him for a 6 year term though he could require a 7 year contract.
His gaffes are usually egregious but fortunately not THAT often imo. I think he'd be an extremely hot commodity at the deadline or in free agency. Fitz should absolutely try to sign him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Inter Milan vs Torino
    Inter Milan vs Torino
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $2,752.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Metz vs Lille
    Metz vs Lille
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $354.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $240.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Bologna vs Udinese
    Bologna vs Udinese
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $265.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Clermont Foot vs Reims
    Clermont Foot vs Reims
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $15.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad