Also from New York and always thought these kind of things were owners treating adult players, the actual talent people come to see, like stupid children.Maybe it's because I'm from New York and the Yankees have a similar policy I don't find this to be a story.
Do they make millionaire's out of athletes?
Does shaving a beard make their skillset?
Or do they have an elite skillset that puts them in the top .01% of an extremely desirable occupation that generates tons and tons of money?
I have a feeling this will be the comment to put an end to this thread, but this comment reminds me a lot of the Kaepernick thing. All the arguments against him are "your employer chooses to pay you" and "your country gave you this opportunity"....at what point are these athletes worth something on their own? (not a real question)
You don't think Derek Jeter or Alex Rodriguez were recognizable? You don't think Aaron Judge is recognizable? Not only do none of them have facial hair to make them "recognizable," but they don't even have their names on their jerseys...home or away. But the Yankees are only what, the 2nd most valuable franchise on the face of God's green earth at 3.7 BILLION dollars?
And you say it's the entertainment business for god's sake.... It's routine for directors to have their actors and actresses grow or cut their hair for a part...to gain or lose weight for a part...to pretty much do whatever the **** they tell them to. That's what they're paying them for. Not to express themselves how they see fit. They have a roll to perform, and they signed on the dotted line knowing the terms and conditions of their employment. So did Engelland.
So facial hair is marketable? Check.Jeter and Rodriguez were among the best players of all time at their positions, while playing for the most popular team in the league during a dynasty phase. They were marketable by default.
How many NHL players are marketable by default? Arguably zero.
So if you are the NHL, it’s in your best interest not to actively promote players in any way possible. That includes having guys like Jagr and Burns with their signature hairstyles, and having traditions like playoff beards that not-coincidentally are among the few things that even the average guy on the street knows about the NHL.
They are asked to do that because they are playing a role that REQUIRES those physical appearances, not because the director arbitrarily dislikes beards.
Facial hair is irrelevant to playing a sport. It has nothing to do with the job. Laying down rules about it is purposeless.
So facial hair is marketable? Check.
You are wrong. Sports is a HUGE corporate business. Every sports team out there is a corporation. The very fact they have uniforms like so many other professions is indicative of this. And it makes complete sense. It just doesn't make sense to you. You're free to speak out because YOU feel it's outdated. But that doesn't mean you're right. The day you own a professional franchise, you can dictate how the employees whom you pay millions to, dress and groom.
They’re professional atheletes in the entetianment business.
BIG difference between their situation and what goes on in environments where it would make more sense to institute such a policy.
Yet again, I’m sitting here trying to understand why people insist on applying these situations to professional atheletes.
I’m not arguing that an owner doesn’t have the right to institute such a policy, I’m arguing that it’s outdated and doesn’t apply to these guys.
You do realize that having that hair remain on your face is voluntary, just like getting a tattoo and letting it remain there, right?
If you don't think a company couldn't force a woman to shave her legs and armpits in an environment where appearance matters, I think you're sorely mistaken. Appearance isn't about performance. No one said it was. When kids attend Catholic school, do you think wearing uniforms is about performance?
I have a job that dictates I wear a suit and tie. I don't get to choose how I appear. If I showed up with an untucked shirt, an unbuttoned collar, a hoop in my nose, etc...I'd never have gotten my job to begin with, much less been able to maintain it...and that would be completely justified.
When I think athletes in the entertainment business...I think...WWF. Actors and actresses are in entertainment. Cirque du Soleil... That's entertainment.
Well...I've said my peace. My opinion's stated, and I've gone back and forth enough on it. I'm not trying to change anyone else's opinion, and I really don't need anyone's approval of mine. They both are what they are. Moving right along...