Ainec
Panetta was not racist
- Jun 20, 2009
- 21,784
- 6,430
nylander is better than pastrnak. there's no way he isn't
geeeeez are posts like these always dominant in leaf centric threads?
nylander is better than pastrnak. there's no way he isn't
I would like to but I can't... 6 years is a long time at 6M with the style that he plays. It'd be a risk for Toronto, however if the condition was needed I would probably do it. Think it'd be smart for Colorado to get EJ out of there before he loses anymore value and gets older. Lets them continue the tank for Dahlin.
He's not wrong though. Outside of McAvoy, Boston has nothing that is anywhere near becoming the defenseman they desperately need - Chara is nearing the end of his career, and McAvoy is absolutely essential for the future without their long-time 1D. If they ship out McAvoy, they have no one to take over Chara's spot, hence why it is only right to ask for the moon and a couple of stars. This, quite simply, boils down to Boston liking their young stud as much as you guys like Matthews. That is the case with a lot of players you guys make proposals for.I want what she's having.
Well said. I didnt take context into it.He's not wrong though. Outside of McAvoy, Boston has nothing that is anywhere near becoming the defenseman they desperately need - Chara is nearing the end of his career, and McAvoy is absolutely essential for the future without their long-time 1D. If they ship out McAvoy, they have no one to take over Chara's spot, hence why it is only right to ask for the moon and a couple of stars. This, quite simply, boils down to Boston liking their young stud as much as you guys like Matthews. That is the case with a lot of players you guys make proposals for.
In short: he didn't claim that McAvoy = Matthews. However, he stated that factoring in Boston's needs, McAvoy >> anything else that the Leafs can offer. If Toronto would call Sweeney, asking for Matthews would be a statement roughly equal to "are you willing to overpay drastically, or is there no deal to be made?"
Changing it to a first doesn't do a thing to change Colorado's mind about that one. EJ is a cornerstone of their roster.Change the second-round pick to a late first-round pick, perhaps.
Bracco + Fehr + 2nd for Erik Johnson
I know EJ is kind of overrated but I think thats a VERY good offer for him. I was going to make the pick a 1st based on the condition that we make it to the 2nd round but dropped that, considering he has 6 more years left at a 6M caphit.
edit: added Eric Fehr as a cap dump, he's a good fourth liner IMO, easily would be used by the Avs. 1 year at 2M.
Changing it to a first doesn't do a thing to change Colorado's mind about that one. EJ is a cornerstone of their roster.
He's not wrong though. Outside of McAvoy, Boston has nothing that is anywhere near becoming the defenseman they desperately need - Chara is nearing the end of his career, and McAvoy is absolutely essential for the future without their long-time 1D. If they ship out McAvoy, they have no one to take over Chara's spot, hence why it is only right to ask for the moon and a couple of stars. This, quite simply, boils down to Boston liking their young stud as much as you guys like Matthews. That is the case with a lot of players you guys make proposals for.
In short: he didn't claim that McAvoy = Matthews. However, he stated that factoring in Boston's needs, McAvoy >> anything else that the Leafs can offer. If Toronto would call Sweeney, asking for Matthews would be a statement roughly equal to "are you willing to overpay drastically, or is there no deal to be made?"
Read post #178 and you too can see the light.Not blaming anyone. Just dumbfounded is all. Thanks for clearing this up.
JVR can play RW too, doesnt he?
If yes, would something around him and Gunnarsson work?
JVR can play RW too, doesnt he?
If yes, would something around him and Gunnarsson work?
Blues would move Steen to RW and put JVR on Stastny's left.JVR is a LW.
Blues would move Steen to RW and put JVR on Stastny's left.
nylander is better than pastrnak. there's no way he isn't
No chronic injuries, concussion issues, or surgeries. But yeah, he's headed to permanent LTIR...
You may want to actually look into his injuries/illnesses that forced him out of the lineup before making such an idiotic claim.
How long will Tanev be out of the line-up this time, and what kind of injury does he have now?No chronic injuries, concussion issues, or surgeries. But yeah, he's headed to permanent LTIR...
You may want to actually look into his injuries/illnesses that forced him out of the lineup before making such an idiotic claim.
2-3 weeks. Still no concussion problems, surgeries, or chronic injuries. I never denied he was injury prone, but it's always been a random assortment of injuries/illnesses and so far none of them have had a negative long-term effect. There's still zero signs that point to him being a permanent LTIR guy in a few years.How long will Tanev be out of the line-up this time, and what kind of injury does he have now?
Why is he so injury prone? Is he just plain unlucky?2-3 weeks. Still no concussion problems, surgeries, or chronic injuries. I never denied he was injury prone, but it's always been a random assortment of injuries/illnesses and so far none of them have had a negative long-term effect. There's still zero signs that point to him being a permanent LTIR guy in a few years.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯Why is he so injury prone? Is he just plain unlucky?
I would prob do this, Jay might bring someone calmness to this D , we'll throw in Marincin !I would honestly offer Bouwmeester and maybe Schmaltz as well for JVR. That would certainly improve your D corps.
Why is he so injury prone? Is he just plain unlucky?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Some of it is bad luck, but some guys are just more prone to injuries from blocked shots/hits/whatever.
Like in 2014, he missed 7 games with a broken thumb, then a few weeks after he returned he broke another finger and missed 11 more games. And last year he missed 2 games due to mumps, and then missed a few more games due to food poisoning.