Well his value will increase the more he's used and produces as a 2C...
I don`t expect much in return, but we need him far away from AV as possible as long he coach in New York. And pls. don`t ask me why we acquired him in the first place - that is still unknown for most Ranger fans, but I assume AV was part of this plan due to lack of center depth and Stepan was moved earlier this summer.
Anyway he was just promoted to 2nd. line center on monday by AV when he had 1 assist to Nash in last game at MSG. A typical old Canuck move so to speak - I still struggle to understand AV decision making the recent years with roster decisions in general.
But this topic is all about David D. so this is no panic move - just curious if he has any value since AV will use him on our 2nd line maybe as early as tomorrow?
I don't see why the Habs have to be involved in a 3 way deal just to help the Rangers get rid of Desharnais.Desharnais has negative value. Montreal could send him away to some team, if they added a 4th rounder to make it worth that team's while.
You made a clown thread acting like the entire fanbase had no idea why Desharnais was on an NHL roster because of a low shooting percentage in 6 games. Take the L on your overreaction.He scored a nice goal in the 2nd. - so AV will probably use him in a top 6 role now.
Fine with Eriksson, but we probably need Sutter.Your choice of Eriksson or Sutter
He would be our leading scorer in Montreal.
Think about that before making for of Desharnais.