There's 1001 possible combinations that can come out of that system, and the listed combinations that each team get add up to 1000. That means there's one more combination out there that won't be claimed by a team.
I want to live in the universe where they redraw the combination that can't be claimed infinitely...or at least for a couple of hoursthere is an extra 1. If it is drawn, there is a redraw.
There's 1001 possible combinations that can come out of that system, and the listed combinations that each team get add up to 1000. That means there's one more combination out there that won't be claimed by a team.
The article posted listed how many combinations each team gets...that list added up to 1000 combinations.You've seen the list?
The article posted listed how many combinations each team gets...that list added up to 1000 combinations.
EDIT: None of the percentages would be exactly right either, were there 1001 winning combinations. A team could never have exactly a 20% chance to win. It could be 19.98%. Yeah, that's close, and it may be splitting hairs, but considering those % are in the leagues bylaws and all, it'd probably be a good idea to adhere to them.
It's literally on the last page and was what started the conversation, but ok.Can you link the article please?
It's literally on the last page and was what started the conversation, but ok.
http://www.nj.com/flyers/index.ssf/2...televisio.html
When is the winner announced? Saturday before the Pittsburgh game?
The article posted listed how many combinations each team gets...that list added up to 1000 combinations.
EDIT: None of the percentages would be exactly right either, were there 1001 winning combinations. A team could never have exactly a 20% chance to win. It could be 19.98%. Yeah, that's close, and it may be splitting hairs, but considering those % are in the leagues bylaws and all, it'd probably be a good idea to adhere to them. And the team that got the extra combination point would be a whole tenth of a percentage point higher.
It's not one number. It's read as 9-11-13-14, which would be different from 13-14-11-9.
I was saying if they assigned all 1001 combinations to the teams.That's not exactly right...
It is actually the odds of winning the first draw, plus the odds of winning the 2nd draw, plus the odds of winning the 3rd draw, plus etc etc forever. This is represented by the following:
P= 200/1001 + 200/1001^2 + 200/1001^3 + 200/1001^4 + ...
And the sum of that infinite series is 20%.
The NHL stated that the order of the numbers drawn does not matter.
I always assumed it was more of a raffle system with balls marked for each team, not numbered combinations...Would fans rather see presentation like what I posted earlier - a slow number draw that takes a few minutes between draws, which reveals the winner after 4-5 minutes, or one draw done with 200 balls, Buffalo with 40, Arizona with 27, Edmonton with 23, etc so that it's a quick decision?
Slow number combination draw?
Quick one-ball winner?
I always assumed it was more of a raffle system with balls marked for each team, not numbered combinations...
Given that team logos vary in size and shape, the amount of ink used to mark each ball would also vary, thus varying the weight of each team's respective balls. How can we ensure the balls are truly equal? Labeling balls by 3 letter team designation would have the same effect.
risto ♡i finally found 2013's draft lottery video. Doesnt show what teams get what number combos, but shows the process and the teams percentages behind bettman.
2013 draft lottery machine
So is the results show going to be on any other networks besides TSN?
^&*^**%&$$*_)__++$$#@#$@ that!... it isn't interesting television.
Isn't it odd that since 2005, three generational talents (Crosby, McDavid, Eichel) have been available at the top of two drafts, and prior to both of those drafts, the NHL has changed the lottery rules? Why might that be?Is it really hard to believe one of the four teams with the greatest odds won the lottery?