For a reasonably intelligent person such as yourself who enjoys analytical data, your opinion is that of an obtuse layman, which I know you aren't.
Henrik's statistical numbers have taken a terrible hit because of the HDSC (high danger scoring chances) the team in front of him is giving up in record numbers. He's being left out to dry most every single night.
It's clear as day, yet you call his play abysmal?
How many times do we have to go through this, lets do it again!
Everyone's expectation of Henrik is to be a superhuman goaltender every time he steps onto the ice. This is unrealistic. He's a human being. He isn't some cyborg who can be programmed to stop every single puck that he shot at him (although he stops a large majority of them)
His play hasn't been as bad as some people think it has been. Can he better? Of course! He COULD post a shutout every single night, but again this is unrealistic. Until people start waking up and seeing the actual issues with this team, we will continue to hear ridiculous posts about how abysmal he's been without mentioning or understanding the depth of what causes breakdowns in play which lead to HDSC's all over the ice on a nightly basis.
No one (or very very few people) expect Hank to be super human, but as the highest paid goalie in the league thers is an expectation that he will play to a very high standard and be the best goalue on the ice most nights. For the majority of Dec it would be fair to say that has not been the case. Is it all Hank's fault? Hell no, not by a long shot; but he hasnt been playing to the standard that is expected if him.
And if he isnt expected to stop hus fair share of the HDSC coming his way, we end up with the afe old question of; if his play is so reliant on the team, are we better off finding an 'average' goalie and using the cap savings to improve the roster elsewhere.
Hank is the best goalie in Ranger history but he can be better than he has been for the last month and he is nit above criticism