Ryuji Yamazaki
Do yuu undastahn!?
- Jul 22, 2015
- 9,051
- 5,304
What a horrible challenge by Cooper. What’s it called when you want something to be true so bad that you almost start to believe it is?
Now you're a Bolts fan.I can see the argument for goaltender interference on both disallowed goals, if I'm being honest, and I'm a Bolts fan. Also, in the bigger picture, those calls weren't the reason we lost the game, or the series.
Now you're a Bolts fan.
Planet earth seems excessive , is it even talked about in FloridaMan the TB whining last night is causing noise pollution on planet earth.
Self-deceptionWhat a horrible challenge by Cooper. What’s it called when you want something to be true so bad that you almost start to believe it is?
tbh, The rules are pretty simple.When it comes to GI the rules are crystal clear:
Heads=goal
Tails= no goal
Duclair has no right to occupy space inside the crease before the arrival of the puck. That's what happens here. Duclair establishes his position in the crease, the shot comes in and bob is impeded in his ability to make a save because of duclair's foot blocking his glove. This wasn't complicated.Duclair's skate goes for the puck as soon as that puck is loose in the crease, it's just as much Duclair's puck as it is Bob's, He doesn't need to wait for Bob to attempt to cover it before he is allowed to play it.
There's no trap of Bob's glove, even though they touch Bob never has his glove moving to make a save when Duclair's skate is there and never gets his skate edge into the ice so at no point is Bob impaired when trying to move to make a save (which is why the second gi is a good call as he is in the process of moving to the save when contacted).
They've been confused about it since before the 1999 final.I still think the goal Hossa scored against the pens that was in the net and the ref took it back because he intedned to blow his whistle was the worst playoff goal overturned. The irony was the whistle wasn't even in his mouth to blow.
I know. Been playing and watching before then.They've been confused about it since before the 1999 final.
Wait. You want to talk about that call now? The one where the contact was caused by a lightning player pushing tkachuk in the back AND occurred outside the crease which is a completely different area of the rule? You have to be doing this on purpose at this point.The goalie interfernce on vasi on game was worse and they allowed the goal. It is not serious turning and the game is over. Just need some consistency for what is goalie interference each series and/or overall.
If only the refs would call them that waytbh, The rules are pretty simple.
Head = Incidental contact outside the crease = goal
Tails = Incidental contact in the crease = no goal
Im saying call them all the same period. If the goalie initates contact with a player outside of his crease that should be on the goalie. If goalies can't be touched no matter what then put that in the rule.Wait. You want to talk about that call now? The one where the contact was caused by a lightning player pushing tkachuk in the back AND occurred outside the crease which is a completely different area of the rule? You have to be doing this on purpose at this point.
Bob head's was out of the crease and he initated contact his Cirelli's rear end. If Tkachuk goal counts then all of the goals should count. If the two goals don't stand last night none of them should have counted. Consistency and clear rules is key. The ref should just be able to make up what is a goal depending on their mood or which team they want to favor tonight.Wait. You want to talk about that call now? The one where the contact was caused by a lightning player pushing tkachuk in the back AND occurred outside the crease which is a completely different area of the rule? You have to be doing this on purpose at this point.
The tkachuk play and the two from last night were completely different scenarios. Sorry you are too upset to realize that.Im saying call them all the same period. If the goalie initates contact with a player outside of his crease that should be on the goalie. If goalies can't be touched no matter what then put that in the rule.
Bob head's was out of the crease and he initated contact his Cirelli's rear end. If Tkachuk goal counts then all of the goals should count. If the two goals don't stand last night none of them should have counted. Consistency and clear rules is key. The ref should just be able to make up what is a goal depending on their mood or which team they want to favor tonight.