eyeroll re: the money. Look--mostly irrelevant to his performance, as we didn't sign him but instead traded for him in order to get a different underperforming problem child (with a bad attitude here if you can believe Russo etc) out of town. you trade your 98 300z with a bent frame and no brakes for a 92 911 with a bent axle and bad tranny then complain when it doesn't work. looks sexier in the garage, at least.
I'm not going to say I thought we wouldn't be squeezing more out of Heatley this year--i did--but his role right now is different, and he is performing it reasonably well considering it's outside his job description. But the money thing matters not one little bit aside from buyout talk, where it is indeed extremely relevant. Of course he could be having the last laugh as we pay him, then he signs somewhere else for another couple million on a one year. he'd probably be okay with a buyout, actually.
edit: please figure this out--we knew what we were trading for. If anyone expected him to get back to his glory-year point totals we would have never been able to get him from San jose for ****ing Havlat. we could hope, yes, but no one was banking on it.