Being automatically dismissive of someone who might believe that, doesn't negate it's possible authenticity. After all, one can look at who is at the core of providing the majority of the agency's review budget, which is big pharma. Along with close to half of the fees they collect for their budget, are from the companies themselves who are applying for what they want to have approved.
I would think in this day & age, there's nothing wrong with not simply taking things at face value & or not being the least bit inquisitive or skeptical, especially if the government is involved. I think we can all agree to that, no?
Sure
Make sure you are questioning all the other governments, and their public health experts, who have also determined that these vaccines benefits outweigh their risks. Make sure you you question the consensus of related experts that are not government employees who have come to the same conclusion. Make sure you pour over the data which include the vaccine trails, the ongoing studies throughout the world (but especially in the UK, Israel, U.S. since they were among the first to vaccinate a large % of their population). Make sure you consider the implications that all these governments, their experts, private experts in related fields, all the media you dislike, all the doctors and nurses working with actual COVID patients, all the data that has been collected, and the subsequent evidence derived from it....consider that all of that has been faked, exaggerated, manipulated to control you, and expose you to a harmful medication (vaccine).
I would love to see a rational justification for that. I don't see how it can be done without diving deep into the paranoid delusional conspiracy theory rabbit hole. The thing is the totality of government, government health officials, related private experts aren't asking you to have FAITH in what they say. They ,companies, government agencies, researchers (government and private), have been releasing the evidence and their assessment of that evidence the whole way along. Every day it seems more studies come out about vaccine effectiveness. I would personally assert that even if they didn't publicly provide the evidence (though obviously they should for transparency) I would still trust their advice because not believing in the consensus of experts would be foolish. I could take my broken car to 10 different mechanics. 9 of the 10 say the problem is the transmission, but one says the problem is a belt. I go home and find a post on Facebook about broken belts. I watch a 10 minute video of a guy on Youtube telling me that the evil "they" are going to try to convince you that the problem is your transmission when really it is the belt. Let's go one step further. 9 of the 10 mechanics who say the problem is the transmission take me under the hood of the car and
show me the evidence for why it is the transmission.
But you know what? The one mechanic was really charismatic, and I liked the contrarian attitude of the FB post and the Youtube video. So I'm going with that. That is what is happening right now.
Ah yes, clearly more dangerous than "I'll do whatever I'm told to do, without question, every time...and if you say a thing to the contrary, you're evil", tolerant mindset. Thankfully for myself, I don't need the vaccine after already having had the virus and recovered, but even if I hadn't had it at this point, I wouldn't get it just to spite people like yourself who have become so narrow minded and have taken leave of their senses during this whole ordeal, that they couldn't possibly ever be wrong or misguided in the least bit.
You can do what you want. I can do what I want and assert that opinion is sad. Unfortunately, this is happening more and more often. People who have mocked the virus, people's reaction's to it, and any type of mitigation method have been dying of the virus and their ignorance and hubris is left behind on social media for everybody to see. Would you really risk dying to prove your pettiness? If you would, at least I'd give you credit for sticking to your principles.
