GDT: Columbus vs. Pittsburgh | 9/15 6PM EDT | Preseason Game 1

Nordique

Add smoked meat, and we have a deal.
Aug 11, 2005
9,138
265
Ohio
The key between all of those youngsters coming in is that, on their teams at the time, they were clear-cut NHLers because they were in the top four almost by default. In my opinion, Murray isn't in that position right now, and probably won't be by the end of the year.

There it is. Of course come December, injuries may dictate the situation.
 

Hello Johnny

Registered User
Apr 13, 2007
13,208
1,142
See, of the 4 defensmen fighting for 1-2 spots, (All played last night), I'd say Goloubef was the least impressive.

Not sure how much of that came from Murray and Savard playing with NHL vets, but that's just my .02

If I had to rank them based on play last night.

Murray
Savard
Melart
Goloubef

But nobody permanently distinguished themselves last night by any means.

Again, I DVR'd it and did a lot of fast forwarding, but I think our bread and butter needs to be with defensive awareness, which I'm not so confident in Savard with. I like him on the PP, which arguably he should be kept on the team because of his QB ability, but if I had to choose between him and Golo, I'd choose Cody because I think he fits our system better.
 

thebus2288*

Guest
You have to look at how a player plays. The fact that we are comparing Melart with Murray is part of the problem. While Savard didn't look bad you have to look a where he would fit. Wiz, Nikitin, JJ, and Tyutin are all better with the puck at the point. Golobeuf, Murray and Erixon are all better defensively with also not being too far behind offensively. Could you even imagine Savard jumping in, beating guys down ice, and scoring the way Murray did? How bout Erixon doing the same. Would rather lose Savard than Golobeuf and it's actually possible Savard would have more trade value. Melart left me wanting more, definitely after the fight.

RJ can skate? Hooray!! Dude still has so much trouble completing a simple pass. **** look at how bad the pass was to Murray at the end. Guy deserves to be playing no higher than the 3rd line this year with minimal PK time and NO please NO PP time.
 

Roadman

Moving On
Sep 9, 2009
2,592
0
London OH
RJ can skate? Hooray!! Dude still has so much trouble completing a simple pass. **** look at how bad the pass was to Murray at the end. Guy deserves to be playing no higher than the 3rd line this year with minimal PK time and NO please NO PP time.

I don't know a lot, but in the replay I've seen, it sure seemed to me the pass was nicely laid out in space for Murray. He didn't have to break stride and simply stroked into the net.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
53,995
31,809
40N 83W (approx)
Again, I DVR'd it and did a lot of fast forwarding, but I think our bread and butter needs to be with defensive awareness, which I'm not so confident in Savard with.

Didn't see any deficiencies in that regard, but the stream I was watching was such that I was occasionally having trouble telling blueliners apart, so the PP was where I saw the most of Savard and was sure it was him. (For example, there was that one time when I thought it was Melart opposite Wiz on the PP... :laugh: Teams shouldn't be allowed to add two guys playing the same position with similar-ish looking names and similar numbers simultaneously! :D )

* * *​
RJ can skate? Hooray!! Dude still has so much trouble completing a simple pass. **** look at how bad the pass was to Murray at the end.

Yeah, it was so horrible it ended up right on Murray's stick without Murray breaking stride or even blinking, with plenty of time to get the shot on net and in the net. Utterly unforgivable.

It never ceases to amaze me just what some people think they're seeing when they watch their favorite Whipping Boy.
 

FlaggerX

Registered User
Mar 21, 2008
1,171
0
Columbus
Yeah, Umby did whiff one one sure goal though admittedly the puck was behind him and there was one play where he should have just backhanded the puck ahead and tried to corrall it, but he did have two assists that I saw, including a beauty on the game winner. He looked pretty good. NIkitin didn't look so good, despite the goal. His defense suffered.
 

CBJx614

Registered User
May 25, 2012
15,009
6,644
C-137
I was very impressed with Murray. I absolutely think he one of our best 6 defensemen. He looks effortless to me, like the game slows down for him. Sure he made a couple of errors, but those will sort themselves out. He looks like he belongs to me. On the GWG, he knew exactly where he needed to join the rush. You don't teach that, it's instinct. Check out twitter, apparently Wiz was pretty impressed with Murray. I would be shocked if he isn't on the club come opening night.

Exactly. He read the play, saw they had an odd man rush if he joined the play and knew his partner was staying home, his positioning was perfect as the 3rd man/trailer. Of course it's not going to work like that every time, but that's huge for Murray to start his season here. As long as he can stay calm and collected now and he/the coaching staff can keep him from trying to do too much I think he won't have a problem in the NHL. Erixon averaged 15/min a game last season, and I could see Murray starting out around there, obviously with a full season to prove he's worth more.
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
Yeah, it was so horrible it ended up right on Murray's stick without Murray breaking stride or even blinking, with plenty of time to get the shot on net and in the net. Utterly unforgivable.

It never ceases to amaze me just what some people think they're seeing when they watch their favorite Whipping Boy.

Looked fine to me.
 

Doug19

Registered User
Oct 14, 2008
6,542
222
Columbus, OH
I don't know what stream you guys were watching, but on the actual stream Umberger whiffed on the shot attempt, the defender poked the puck and the poke went right to Murray, which Murray buried of course.
 

FANonymous

Registered User
Nov 7, 2010
4,911
0
I don't know what stream you guys were watching, but on the actual stream Umberger whiffed on the shot attempt, the defender poked the puck and the poke went right to Murray, which Murray buried of course.

You forgot to mention the part where he kicked a puppy that had wandered onto the ice.
 

Crede777

Deputized
Dec 16, 2009
14,675
4,237
I don't care if he passes the puck off everyone's skates including the refs', as long as he gets it to his teammate and the teammate buries it it's a good play.

Hopefully he can keep it up. I don't want the new Umberger to show up in September but leave in December. Let's get a solid season.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
53,995
31,809
40N 83W (approx)
I don't know what stream you guys were watching, but on the actual stream Umberger whiffed on the shot attempt, the defender poked the puck and the poke went right to Murray, which Murray buried of course.
Because all defensemen, when they do a pokecheck, do so with a one-handed backhand smack that sends it two meters towards an oncoming opponent. And you can truly tell when someone screws up a shot attempt because he's aiming towards the far wall rather than the net.

For ****'s sake, people,. This is just ****ing sad. Give it up already. He Made The Play. You Don't Get To Bash Him Today.
 
Last edited:

EspenK

Registered User
Sep 25, 2011
15,656
4,226
I'd like to see Umberger make that play in about 100 more games this season.

That's pretty optimistic on two counts. Umbie making that play 100 times ain't gonna happen and I don't see the Jackets going 16-2 in the Cup-unless you are counting the remaining x games then 16-8 doesn't seem unreasonable. :)
 
Last edited:

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
And you can truly tell when someone screws up a shot attempt because he's aiming towards the far wall rather than the net.

I'll watch the vid again, but it sure looked like he was looking at Murray when the pass came. Looked like, at first glance, that he was putting it in space for the trailer.

I'll be shocked, when I watch it again, that if I can see any evidence that he attempted a shot. My first impression was pass all the way.

But then again it could be just not watching it for a couple of days. But above is the impression I got when I watched the replay (twice) on Sunday.

Regardless, he's certainly in massive whipping boy territory. There was no reason to jump on him.
 

Dr. Fire

What, me worry?
Jun 29, 2007
7,793
63
Jacketstown, Ohio
It was a pass, plain and simple.

It was not a shot attempt

It was not a poke check

It was a pass all the way

Great play by Umby, followed by a great finish by Murray.

End of story.
 

1857 Howitzer

******* Linesman
Aug 27, 2007
5,715
193
Ohio
I've watched this 15 times now and I see nothing but a pass. If anything after watching it over and over I'm more impressed with the pass because it seems like he saucers the puck over the defenders stick. Maybe that is what Doug is seeing as a whiffed shot?

 
Last edited:

Socks

Stuff and Things Man
Nov 14, 2007
11,531
5,704
Stuff and Things
Umby passed the puck to Murray. Anyone who can't see that is too blinded by their hatred of him to be able to view any play he's involved with rationally. He passed the puck. Period. End of story. Don't forget to tip your waitress.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
53,995
31,809
40N 83W (approx)
I'll watch the vid again, but it sure looked like he was looking at Murray when the pass came. Looked like, at first glance, that he was putting it in space for the trailer.

I'll be shocked, when I watch it again, that if I can see any evidence that he attempted a shot. My first impression was pass all the way.

But then again it could be just not watching it for a couple of days. But above is the impression I got when I watched the replay (twice) on Sunday.

Regardless, he's certainly in massive whipping boy territory. There was no reason to jump on him.
That was kind of my point, actually. :)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad