Seravalli: Columbus engaged in trade talks to move defenseman

[Mrfenn92]

Werenski for Maata + Chiarot

Obviously Columbus retains on Zach

 

[tunnelvision]

Curious if Anaheim will kick tires… as it is now we potentially have 3 rookies + drysdale playing

What would it take to get Hinds? Just wondering if he could become available at some point since you seem to have about 4 guys ahead of him in the LD hierarchy.

what is Boqvist's value?

i know we have alot of bodies but i would like to trade for him

Boqvist+pick for Beck?

 

[CupInSIX]

Canucks are obvious suitors but I'll say Peeke to Toronto
For Timmins and a 4th

(Brodie shipped out)

 

[TaketheCannoli]

Werenski for Maata + Chiarot

You misspelled Larkin.

 

[Richard88]

Canucks are obvious suitors but I'll say Peeke to Toronto
For Timmins and a 4th

Why would Columbus want Timmins as part of the return? The point is to create more flexibility on the blueline with less bodies, not making sideways moves for the sake of making a move.

 

[Mrfenn92]

What would be the ask from Chicago

 

[Nucker42]

Rathbone, Beavillier at 15% retained and NJ 4th for Peeke and a 3rd.

Beau is a useful player. Peeke seems okay according to CBJ fans.

 

[La Bamba]

Broberg, Foegele, prospects/picks for Boqvist and Texier

 

[Double-Shift Lasse]

Werenski for Maata + Chiarot

Broberg, Foegele, prospects/picks for Boqvist and Texier

Peeke
Boqvist
Bean

That's it. That's all. Not talking about anyone else.

 

[Bottle Rocket]

Holy cow, this feels like a farmers market...

Welcome ladies and gentlemen! Take a peek at this beauty, 6'3'' 210 lbs of meat. You won't see a udder like that outside of Columbus county.

No? What about this Swedish Friesian, only 23 years old, fast and a lot of potential. Look at her teeth!

Or this one? This ain't a bunch of magic beans, no, this one is a breeder.

Sold to the gentleman from Canada with strange knives under his boots!

 

[cbjthrowaway]

Broberg, Foegele, prospects/picks for Boqvist and Texier

texier is fully off the table. he's carving out a major role in the lineup this year and even if they were open to trading him, now isn't the time since he just missed the full season.

if you swapped texier out for one of robinson/foudy/bemstrom and took out the picks, i'd consider it. broberg would slide into the LD3 spot.

 

[Drumman44]

Makes the Jones trade hurt less because Boqvist isn't THAT good.

Yeah but Jiricek

 

[LEAFANFORLIFE23]

What would Peeke realistically cost Toronto?

 

[LemonSauceD]

Beauvillier 20% retained for Peeke makes a lot of sense.

 

[cbjthrowaway]

What would be the ask from Chicago

chicago seems to be an ideal trade partner since they have open contract spots + cap space + draft capital.

given the jackets' roster math at present, the ideal return is picks and nothing else. price varies by defenseman (boqvist > peeke > bean in terms of trade value imo).

 

[Viqsi]

Werenski

You can stop right there.

* * *​

Chandler Stephenson for Peeke?

Um. Yeah. Sure. We'll get right on that quickly before Vegas comes to their senses.

* * *​

Broberg, Foegele, prospects/picks for Boqvist and Texier

After the preseason he's had, Texier is not available for anything you will willingly offer.

 

[Viqsi]

Beauvillier 20% retained for Peeke makes a lot of sense.

Less so for us because we also have a forward logjam.

 

[cbjthrowaway]

What would Peeke realistically cost Toronto?

i don't think toronto could actually do it without sending back a bigger salary. the only one big enough that they didn't just sign is brodie.

would be a short-term upgrade for the jackets and give toronto some cap flexiblity, but it only marginally gives columbus more flexibility (starting next year) which some may say defeats the purpose.

personally i'd do something around bean (50% retained) and peeke for brodie. not sure about leafs fans though.

 

[Mrfenn92]

chicago seems to be an ideal trade partner since they have open contract spots + cap space + draft capital.

given the jackets' roster math at present, the ideal return is picks and nothing else. price varies by defenseman (boqvist > peeke > bean in terms of trade value imo).

Agreed

 

[cbjthrowaway]

Less so for us because we also have a forward logjam.

beauvillier + the ability to get blankenburg into the lineup >>> the marginal risk of losing one of foudy/bemstrom to a waiver claim (both passed last year more than once)

 

[McJedi]

I see the Avs being a team Columbus would be talking with. Avs need a bottom pair RHD to play with Girard. Preferably a bigger guy like Peeke.

Vancouver isn’t going to be the only team with a hat in this ring.

 

[Mrb1p]

Something around Boqvist and Monahan ? I still like Adams upside and he would fit in well next to someone like Guhle or Xehkaj.

 

[Breakers]

I can’t wait to see that massive draft capital Vancouver wastes

The desperation this team shows knows no bounds.

 

[Mrb1p]

I see the Avs being a team Columbus would be talking with. Avs need a bottom pair RHD to play with Girard. Preferably a bigger guy like Peeke.

Vancouver isn’t going to be the only team with a hat in this ring.

They should pay up for Kovacevic then. Cheap ass contract, size, grity and ability to defend.

 

[LEAFANFORLIFE23]

i don't think toronto could actually do it without sending back a bigger salary. the only one big enough that they didn't just sign is brodie.

would be a short-term upgrade for the jackets and give toronto some cap flexiblity, but it only marginally gives columbus more flexibility (starting next year) which some may say defeats the purpose.

personally i'd do something around bean (50% retained) and peeke for brodie. not sure about leafs fans though.

I don't know that Bean would be of interest I think Peeke is the target because of his size.

I also kind of doubt Brodie would waive to go to Columbus because his wife has MS and she can get top quality treatment in Toronto which is supposedly why he signed.