I called you obnoxiously cocky, actually. Not crazy.
I never mentioned revenge offer-sheets, I don't believe they are a threat whatsoever - nor do they need to be used as a threat. A team that has picked top 10 in six of the last nine seasons + top 4 in four of the past nine seasons should be effectively dissuaded by the prospect of giving up four 1st-rounders to acquire any player.
Just as I suspected, you don't know the rules. Shocker
An offersheet that is
over 5 years in term is measured, for compensation purposes only, on a five-year scale. If you offer Stone $8,118,641m over 6 years, that's 9.74m, approx, for compensation purposes. If you offer Stone $8,118,641 over 7 years, that's 11.365m, approx, for compensation purposes. And if you offer Stone $8,118,641 over 5 years, well, the Sens match that easily.
Any more theories?