I won't try to pinpoint what exactly is wrong on the Avs, but there seems to be something terribly wrong (aside from their placement in the standings).
I predicted that Iginla had more left than what he was showing. Why? Because I really feel that MacKinnon, Duchene and Landeskog are ALL better than what they have been showing. Heck, look at a guy like Joe Colborne. People can point and laugh all they want about the quality of a player he is, but you have to go back 5 years in his career where he played 10 games for Toronto to see him equal his output for this year.
http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=101538
Let that sink in.
If Jarome was doing poorly, but at least some of the players on the Avs were having good seasons even though the team as a whole was not experiencing any success, I would have bet against him showing like he had anything left.
Did everyone on the Avs simply give up? Is it systems-related? I personally have no idea, and it won't be fair of me to venture a guess as I don't follow them closely enough to have any insight. Other teams going through rebuilds still have guys that put up points - some even end up having career years as they get more opportunity than they normally do as the lack of depth allows for more ice-time.
Jarome is turning 40 this year, so of course he is a shell of his former self. Any player - even Jagr - is a shell of his former self than he was at his prime. He is just not AS terrible as he was on the AVs, and I am guessing that at least half of the Avs' roster is not as terrible as they are showing.
Hopefully LA makes it into the playoffs. I am personally really curious to see how much Iginla has left in his tank through the rest of the season and (hopefully) into the playoffs.