McManked
Ooh to be a Gooner
Order? Discussion? Rumours?
I've heard Windsor is going to try and get a good player.
I've heard Windsor is going to try and get a good player.
Steelheads have Babinstev and 1 spot open, hopefully they pick up a top 6 forward as next year the forwards will be very weak.
Can't trade picks anymore it seems - new rule. Spits pick 11th, I don't know how they can expect a top player unless this years class is much deeper than last years.
The lesser teams that have high picks will draft high end imports that may not report and then team cant trade that pick. If the kid wants to report, the team may not be able to compensate accordingly. The new rule doesnt help the less alluring teams.
I agree I don't like the new rule. A team like Kingston would have a fairly high pick that might get them some value in trade as they have 2 imports coming back and won't use the pick.How does this help them?
Owner will not pay to bring over top 6 forward.
Can't trade picks anymore it seems - new rule. Spits pick 11th, I don't know how they can expect a top player unless this years class is much deeper than last years.
If the Spitfires are awarded the Memorial Cup, I wouldn't be surprised to see them deal up in the draft, grab a top five or six pick, and keep Pavelka.
You're not allowed to deal up in the draft anymore.
Ill ask again, when was that voted in. I don't believe that there has been any formal changes as of now.
There have been alot of articles suggesting that changes where on the way, but I have not heard of anything being voted in
Kitchener traded Plymouth's 1st to Sudbury this year and there were several Import picks traded in the Q as well. So it kind of looks like it was talked about and never approved.
I was under the impression it passed, but when I went online this afternoon to search, there was nothing obvious (I had 5-min before class, so it wasn't exactly a thorough search) about a definitive rule change. It was all "proposed" articles from a couple of months back.
Retaining Pavelka next season would require the Spitfires to use one of those two import spots and one of the team’s three overage spots. As well, the Spitfires would have to pass on that second pick in the first round of the import draft, which could be in the top 20, since teams are no longer allowed to trade picks in the import draft.
“To me, it is what it is, but there’s a lot we have to look at,” Boughner said.
Windsor Star's Parker is far from the end all authority but he seemed to be interviewing Boughner for the piece and touched on the import situation. This is from a article a week ago -
http://blogs.windsorstar.com/2013/03/13/spitfires-weigh-future-roster-options/
In the proposed, possibly passed, rule on trading picks, can you pick a player and trade him soon after? Example, Cape Breton likely won't attract a high end Euro again this year so they likely wanna move down. Seems likely they could pick a player for a team like Quebec and move that euro player to them for young players, other euros, picks, or something.
In the proposed, possibly passed, rule on trading picks, can you pick a player and trade him soon after? Example, Cape Breton likely won't attract a high end Euro again this year so they likely wanna move down. Seems likely they could pick a player for a team like Quebec and move that euro player to them for young players, other euros, picks, or something.