Value of: CHI - Saad for a similar aged defenseman
- Thread starter Toews4Days
- Start date
with the past discussion of Saad and trading of him. it comes back to this, Saad and Leddy.....
for me, this is as close as a fair trade for both teams.
SotasicA
Registered User
- Aug 25, 2014
- 8,489
- 6,404
Except nobody on the Hawks wants Leddy back. They need somebody who can defend, not let in even more goals.
then i am wrong in my pov. i never knew about the Bhawks pov. many thanks for correcting my point.
btw i wonder why the Bhawks wouldn't want Leddy ?? it sounds as he burnt his bridge.....
Ace Card Bedard
Back in Black, Red, and White
- Feb 11, 2012
- 8,780
- 3,628
JaegerDice
The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
- Dec 26, 2014
- 25,146
- 9,404
Why would we move Saad now?
His perceived value is low, despite the fact he's going to have another 25 goal season (or more).
Plus, he's one of like 3 2-way forwards we have.
Keep him.
If you need to move somebody, move Anisimov. But with Ward and Kunitz coming off the books and Manning and Rutta already off the books, Blackhawks have plenty of cap space to spend.
His perceived value is low, despite the fact he's going to have another 25 goal season (or more).
Plus, he's one of like 3 2-way forwards we have.
Keep him.
If you need to move somebody, move Anisimov. But with Ward and Kunitz coming off the books and Manning and Rutta already off the books, Blackhawks have plenty of cap space to spend.
Saad just put Fredrik Andersen in a swimming pool. Saad worked with a skills coach for the first time this past summer and its showing
Chicago will gladly keep saad, hes a whole other player than what he was last year right now
Chicago will gladly keep saad, hes a whole other player than what he was last year right now
