Kane himself credited Panarin with a lot of his success for the Hart season. And whether you want to believe Kane was just being modest or what have you, the chemistry those two had on the ice was undeniable and Panarin helped Kane's game achieve new heights. Outside of last season and the Hart season, Kane only had ONE season where he scored in the 80s before. "On pace for" does not equal actually doing something. The straight up fact is Kane had his two best points-producing seasons to date with Panarin on his left wing.
And Panarin is not a product of Kane, which is the point I was trying to make. Kane scored 17 fewer points this season than last, but Panarin still produced approximately the same amount (3 fewer points, but more goals). So Panarin was not some passenger on Kane's out-of-this-world season.
Whether Panarin was one-dimensional or not, 74 points is 74 points. I would bet Columbus doesn't care how goals are scored as long as they actually ARE scored. Moreover, I am betting that you will see many more "dimensions" to Panarin in Columbus now that he will be THE guy on offense. Panarin is not some complementary player. He is a very gifted playmaker in his own right (I know people here generally don't give a crap about anything other than the NHL, but his playmaking ability was on full display at this year's World Championships in which he was the top scorer) and since he won't be deferring to Kane, the rest of the league will see that he is much more than just that one-timer.
I followed Panarin in the KHL prior to him coming to Chicago, and I knew he would do great in the NHL because his talent was so obvious. I also believe he will continue to be a beast in Columbus, even without Kane.