xsniper11x
Registered User
I think these Hawks moves are coming from ownership. They’re trying to save every penny where possible.
I think they misunderstood when people said they needed to clean house after the Kyle Beach scandal.Not that I hate it, but WTF is going on in Chicago?
If they ask out the Hawks can move Kane most likely
Toews is more difficult because of his decline + salary even at retention. He is most likely TDL when he will be more affordable to move to contender to provide depth at LW or C
I am hoping Connor Murphy is traded soon but he has partial NTC as well as Jake McCabe but his struggles in first half of last year probably make him less appealing to teams at moment. He also has a limited NTC but it's a no Canada list it appears (7 team list = 7 teams in Canada) so that isn't much of an issue
Plus, Hawks probably want at least one of them around with Jones to be vet with kids
If someone has a pulse and can skate that is instant replacement for the bum
If Connolly was NHL player he wouldn't have been cap dump from Florida and playing in Rockford
He isn't good enough for NHL at this point
Value is subjective.Buying them out and paying penalties on their contracts for two years is the definition of negative value...
Feel bad for Luke Richardson.
100% thisWhy even buyout Borgstrom?
It would have been a 1 million caphit this year, then RFA. You bury him, so only have $75,000 against this cap this year, than don't qualify him next year.
Instead, with the buyout he counts as $83,334 against the cap this year, and $183,334 next year.
Like what is Chicago thinkin? I get there's actual dollars paid out involved, but your Chicago, you have money.
Or random HF poster doesn’t know what GM is doing even though he has been very clear about his plan since we was hired as the full-time GM.Or GM doesn't know what he's doing.
These players don’t play the type of game that new Hawk leadership wants. If you want speed and grit you don’t want players seeing veterans like Borgstrom, Connelly, Strome or Kubalik leading the way.It's not really a big deal. Usually, though, if a club knows that they're going to be godawful, they would give players that would otherwise be buyout candidates or fringe NHLers a bunch of ice time so that they could be potential rebound candidates/deadline bait (see Arizona). Moves like this, along with the Strome and Kubalik non-tenders, seem very questionable in that context, unless you think that you can fill ALL of that open space with cap dumps.
But they will play the game (to the best of their ability) the way management wants it played moving forward.I get the feeling that many, many worse players will suit up for Chicago this season.
Did Dollar Bill rise from his grave?I think these Hawks moves are coming from ownership. They’re trying to save every penny where possible.
Complete rebuildWhat the hell is going on in chicago
Their rebuild may or may not succeed, letting Borgstrom and Connolly go won’t be the reason for failure.I for one am looking forward to getting, in the years going forward, yet another strong example of how tearing it all down to the studs (like so many folks keep insisting everybody should do every time the New Hotness comes along) is a consistent recipe for disaster. Because this will end badly. Of this I am absolutely, 100% certain.
I don't think TyJo is going to hold up under that pressure and given all that's gone on I'm not yet convinced they keep Kurashev. And even if I'm wrong on both that's not enough forwards.
The blueline is "fine" (by these standards) but admittedly I can't remember who they'd currently be developing there in the first place off the top of my head. (EDIT: OMFG I'm an idiot, of course they just drafted Korchinski and Rinzel.)
I'm just looking at this roster and shaking my head, thinking "Reichel and Nazar are going to be absolutely destroyed as prospects and that's not just a damned shame, it ought to be a crime." (Then again, given the precedents set with Dach and Boqvist, this was perhaps inevitable...)
If there's nobody else to fill in those spots on the roster, then I consider this a distinction without a difference.It’s a bit different for Reichel and Nazar. They are not expected to be missing pieces. They are just expected to play good hockey. Dach and Boqvist had extreme pressure from day one to produce and be the missing pieces.
Huge difference
These players don’t play the type of game that new Hawk leadership wants. If you want speed and grit you don’t want players seeing veterans like Borgstrom, Connelly, Strome or Kubalik leading the way.
I don't think TyJo is going to hold up under that pressure and given all that's gone on I'm not yet convinced they keep Kurashev. And even if I'm wrong on both that's not enough forwards.
The blueline is "fine" (by these standards) but admittedly I can't remember who they'd currently be developing there in the first place off the top of my head. (EDIT: OMFG I'm an idiot, of course they just drafted Korchinski and Rinzel.)
I'm just looking at this roster and shaking my head, thinking "Reichel and Nazar are going to be absolutely destroyed as prospects and that's not just a damned shame, it ought to be a crime." (Then again, given the precedents set with Dach and Boqvist, this was perhaps inevitable...)