Brent Burns
“”“Re-tooling on the fly”””
- Feb 7, 2007
- 7,262
- 574
No one is freaking out in this thread at all, relax.Chicago buys out two forwards who combined for 8 points last season. With one of them spending nearly 75% of the season buried in the AHL. And folks freak out.
Damn right it is.This is a real-life version of the movie Major League except it's hockey vs. baseball.
Dropping two sub-repalcement players isn't a negative value movePeople are pointing out that Chicago is making yet another negative value move
Buying them out and paying penalties on their contracts for two years is the definition of negative value...Dropping two sub-repalcement players isn't a negative value move
Incompetent would be holding onto these waste of roster spots
Buying them out and paying penalties on their contracts for two years is the definition of negative value...
I don't think TyJo is going to hold up under that pressure and given all that's gone on I'm not yet convinced they keep Kurashev. And even if I'm wrong on both that's not enough forwards.They still have Kane, Toews, Johnson, Kurashev up front and Jones, Murphy, Stillman, McCabe on the back end. They could and probably will sell some of those at the deadline, but they aren't bereft of vets yet. Borgstrom wasn't going to be the difference maker, and Dach's confidence likely would have been crushed by the upcoming season So the only vet they got rid of who could have been part of the solution is Debrincat. And they may even add a few vets in free agency who better fit their new team profile.
Not sure this is quite as big a tear down as you think.
The goal isn't for 1 guy to do it all... It's still gonna be about being in a long rebuild for 3 years or so after that.
I swear to G-d, everybody makes this particular strawman mistake...
Yes, having those top end stars greatly increases the chances of winning. BUT if you rip everything up like the Blackhawks are doing in an attempt to gamble for one, then even if you do get the guy (at best a weighted coin flip, and it is not weighted in your favor) the odds of him actually being able to lead the scrambled, broken, demoralized ash heap that constitutes the rest of the team that's left over are pretty much nonexistent. By tearing your team to shreds like this, you destroy any hope of being able to develop the supporting cast and you end up with folks that have all the talent in the world but zero motivation or confidence. We've seen it so many times before.
...Obviously, but the rest of the guys aren't going to be able to develop well if they're expected to immediately take on heavy NHL minutes. That's the problem.The goal isn't for 1 guy to do it all... It's still gonna be about being in a long rebuild for 3 years or so after that.
Seems like if these guys are that bad they should just keep them all.Maximizing their chances at Bedard, like so many others
Who is gonna play hockey for Chicago at this point?
No one is freaking out in this thread at all, relax.
People are pointing out that Chicago is making yet another negative value move, and the aggregate of all of these negative value moves over the past week or so is worthy of discussion and very much open to criticism.
Maybe they're preparing to take every teams cap dumps.
No way Toews/Kane aren’t traded soon. No way
Whatever on Borgstrom although there is almost no one to replace him so why not just carry him for the year. Maybe he leaves on his own. Connolly was an actual NHL player albeit over-payed for who he is. Don't see many of those on the roster. Any return to form he could yield something in return later in the season. I know collecting assets isn't a priority however.
Whatever on Borgstrom although there is almost no one to replace him so why not just carry him for the year. Maybe he leaves on his own. Connolly was an actual NHL player albeit over-payed for who he is. Don't see many of those on the roster. Any return to form he could yield something in return later in the season. I know collecting assets isn't a priority however.