Dumpster Flyers
Registered User
- Jun 21, 2006
- 5,932
- 1,233
Strome's production isn't sustainable. His on ice SH% with the Hawks is absurd.
Strome's production isn't sustainable. His on ice SH% with the Hawks is absurd.
LolStrome's production isn't sustainable. His on ice SH% with the Hawks is absurd.
Lol
Posts like this make ZERO sense.
What about his assists? With the Hawks he has 30 assists in 47 games which equates to 52 assists over 82, so completely ignoring shooting percentage and let's just earmark him for 15 goals for 82 games in the future (which is laughably attainable for him), that still makes him a 67 pt player
So how exactly is this production unsustainable?
People need to just stop hoping he turns back into a bust and acknowledge he's actually a really damn good player that's finally being given a shot
Lol
Posts like this make ZERO sense.
What about his assists? With the Hawks he has 30 assists in 47 games which equates to 52 assists over 82, so completely ignoring shooting percentage and let's just earmark him for 15 goals for 82 games in the future (which is laughably attainable for him), that still makes him a 67 pt player
So how exactly is this production unsustainable?
on ice shooting percentage is different from personal shooting percentage
DeBrincat, who has an unsustainably high personal shooting percentage.*So the on ice shooting percentage is unsustainable because he's on a line with debrincat who is a top 5 sniper in the league right now?
DeBrincat, who has an unsustainably high personal shooting percentage.*
That and him, Gallagher, and M. Tkachuk are the only 3 guys in the top 31 for goals who play less than 18mins a night. So even if DeBrincat's shooting percentage dips a little, he (and Strome) should play an extra minute or two per game in future seasons, which would help Strome's numbers a bit.19.5% is unsustainable BUT he shot 15.5% during his rookie season so I would argue that 14-18% is not an crazy assumption to make for following season plus his shot total will continue to increase a bit as he further matures.
Strome should be at least a 65+ point player most seasons as he will consistently get PP time with Kane and Debrincat plus he will play a big top 6 role going forward.
Is the production of people who play on a line with stamkos, ovechkin, etc unsustainable too?
He's getting the puck to guys who have lethal shots and they're burying it. Anyone watching these games know the goals are far from lucky or flukey. The release and shots are overpowering goalies. These arent terrible goals that goalies are letting leak through
19.5% is unsustainable BUT he shot 15.5% during his rookie season so I would argue that 14-18% is not an crazy assumption to make for following season plus his shot total will continue to increase a bit as he further matures.
Strome should be at least a 65+ point player most seasons as he will consistently get PP time with Kane and Debrincat plus he will play a big top 6 role going forward.
I mean, it's debrincats sophomore season and he's about to hit 40 goals. He's 21 and not even close to entering his prime yet. He might very well turn into a 50 goal scorer one day given his release and how quickly he gets the puck off his stick in tight spaces and picks corners
The monster numbers he put up on the otters both with and without mcdavid, led the Hawks with 28 goals in his rookie season, and is about to follow it up with 40 goals, it probably a safer bet to think he's always going to be reliable for 35+ goals annually moving forward given his consistent ability to bury the puck at elite rates at nearly every level of hockey he's played
Sorry, i wasn't. I was agreeing with you. Debrincat is going to get better and still pot a crap ton of goals and stromes assists will mirror that as long as they stay together.I don't get what you are trying to argue with me about.
Going forward I think:
Perlini - 20g/15a/35pts
Strome - 20g/50a/70pts
Schmaltz - 20g/55a/75pts (if Arizona surrounds him with talent.. otherwise 15g/45a)
He's going to be forced to be the main go-to guy in Arizona, which will result in that potential production.I don't think you've watched a full season of schmaltz being allergic to contact and the goal crease to think schmaltz hits almost PPG pace for an entire 82 game season otherwise you wouldn't be saying this
There's only so much perimeter playing you can do and still rack up points for long stretches of time
I hope the trade motivated him to be a more engaged player but that's certainly one of the main reasons chicago traded him
His production is sustainable if he plays with Debrincat, and gets PP time with Kane. How many points does he have that don't involve Debrincat or Kane? Who else is he making better besides those 2 which obviously need his help?Lol
Posts like this make ZERO sense.
What about his assists? With the Hawks he has 30 assists in 47 games which equates to 52 assists over 82, so completely ignoring shooting percentage and let's just earmark him for 15 goals for 82 games in the future (which is laughably attainable for him), that still makes him a 67 pt player
So how exactly is this production unsustainable?
People need to just stop hoping he turns back into a bust and acknowledge he's actually a really damn good player that's finally being given a shot
Some dude named Perlini has had some recent success playing with Strome...His production is sustainable if he plays with Debrincat, and gets PP time with Kane. How many points does he have that don't involve Debrincat or Kane? Who else is he making better besides those 2 which obviously need his help?
Perlini isn't very good. He rides hot streaks to make his numbers look better and is otherwise a non-factor.
actually i see him improving his value for some other teams. in other words, making him more attractive for a possible off-season trade.Perlini isn't very good. He rides hot streaks to make his numbers look better and is otherwise a non-factor.