Okay, screw the analogy. I don't know if you're just straight up trolling me, or if you really don't understand, but I'll try again.
If we would get a random Swede to our team in 5 years, and none of us knew at this point who this Swede was, I would be inclined to agree with you that it would be a good chance that he wasn't a crash and banger, but rather a player relying on high hockey IQ, skating and finesse.
I'm not extreme to the point where I don't see that people from different places in the world have different tendensies, aswell as men and women have different tendensies as groups.
But we're not talking about a random player here. We're talking about a well scouted player, with known weaknesses and strengths, who isn't going to magically change into a player who makes it into the NHL on pure offensive skills alone. Klingberg don't have the skillset to make it to the NHL without playing a physical up tempo game. He is just not that player. Despite there being many Swedish hockey players in the NHL who are.
It's the same as with several of the defensive defensemen I mentioned. Just because we have a lot of offensive defensemen doesn't mean that Mattias Norström ever had the chance of making it to the NHL by making slick passes and highlight reel goals. Despite this, he managed to play in the NHL for 14 seasons, and become a captain for the Kings.