The Stempniak trade, keeping Tanner Glass on the roster, 6 months at a time.
Last edited:
The Stempniak trade, keeping Tanner Glass on the roster, 6 months at a time.
Klingberg looked like he had potential to take a 4th line wing spot or be a 13th forward. Personally I think I'd prefer him over Ryan Bourque (because of the size issue)--and maybe over Glass--at least in some situations.
It's not a big loss. He's been banging around in the AHL for a few years without really taking the next step and it's not like the Jets have the greatest forward depth. He's pretty much become a very good player at the AHL level---excellent size and really good wheels. The Rangers I'm sure will sign someone to replace him.
Four years, Carl takes the puck wide. Drives to the net, takes a shot...it ends up in the corner. FOUR YEARS of that. Klingberg is a dime a dozen player. Was never high on him. Great off ice guy, best of luck. However you won't have trouble replacing him for Hartford.
So essentially the Rangers gave up Stempniak for a worse player in Sheppard and lost a 4th round pick because of it too.
And then people wonder why others get mad because of Tanner Glass. It has the ripple effect that leads to stupid decisions like this. Shame of it is Stempniak could have slid in well into the top 9 during the playoffs to replace Zucc.
This is completely on AV...
His mismanagement of Stempniak, his overuse of Glass, and his "need" for having intimidation in the lineup...
Sather needs to ship Glass out on July 1st to ANY cap floor team. This move really makes AV look like a dumbass
Glass has nothing to do with this.
And I would argue that Miller stepping in did as well as Stempniak would have done, if not better.
who in the world said or thought Glass was here to intimidate ? he was here to counter what may have happen and to his credit he did and fought well when needed. he also stood out in the playoffs. Stop inventing terms or labels that don't exist
who in the world said or thought Glass was here to intimidate ? he was here to counter what may have happen and to his credit he did and fought well when needed. he also stood out in the playoffs. Stop inventing terms or labels that don't exist
Stempniak was traded for cap reasons. Not to acquire a future asset.
who in the world said or thought Glass was here to intimidate ? he was here to counter what may have happen and to his credit he did and fought well when needed. he also stood out in the playoffs. Stop inventing terms or labels that don't exist
Glass takes up 1.45 million on the cap. It's clear as day the Rangers wanted him to play over anyone else (Sheppard, Stempniak, etc). If they wanted to ice the best team possible, Glass is either dealt for whatever they could get or sent down to clear 925K and then they bring in Sheppard. Reason why Stempniak was dealt was because they didn't have enough space under the cap to fit both Sheppard and him and they clearly preferred Sheppard.
And the team won a Presidents Trophy with Glass over Stemp and Shepp
Not retaining Klingberg has nothing to do with Glass.
And truth be told, AV preferred Glass over both.
Again, had the team been healthy there's a good possibility that we could still be playing. Meaning that the choice of Glass over the other two (while you may not like) had no bearing on the team winning or losing meaning Glass is not to blame for any of this.
And I hate glass.