maacoshark
Registered User
- Jul 22, 2017
- 9,629
- 3,723
Like I said if you move one then you have to move both.Move Samsonov for a decent veteran backup maybe + maybe a future?
BTW we should have moved Sammy when he was still playing in the KHL
Like I said if you move one then you have to move both.Move Samsonov for a decent veteran backup maybe + maybe a future?
Bmac needs to get a number 1 goalie.
Why do you have to move both?Like I said if you move one then you have to move both.
BTW we should have moved Sammy when he was still playing in the KHL
That way you can't keep the wrong guy. To tell the truth neither are really starting NHL calibre goalies. I think Sammy still has chance to be a starter if he gets his head out of his ass.Why do you have to move both?
It will makes Caps over-reliant . 1A 1B is better than a Holtby/Copley situation
I think Vanecek/Samsonov can become Elliott/Allen or similar
Maybe you should be the goalie coach.And a new/better goalie coach please!
How about Halak/Elliott tandem in STL?Quite frankly, that is not very promising for comparisons. Elliot/Allen started out as #1 goalies for the Sens and Blues, but didn't sustain it for long. Both have ended up being 1B goalies at best with their overall careers.
Why do you have to move both?
Any interest in getting Holtby back?
Very well said.You don't. VV trade value is not that good in my opinion. He doesn't do anything particularly well as his ceiling is just about reached. Sammy's ceiling hasn't been reached, but his mental game is all over the place. A better goalie coach or new team could fix what's wrong with Sammy. Sammy still has the better trade value because he has the size and tools for an NHL goalie. Maybe their might be some other GM's out their that strongly think they have the right goalie coach to fix Sammy. I strongly feel it's just not going to work out here for him.
How about Halak/Elliott tandem in STL?
They had a Jennings in 2011-12 with around the same GP.Halak was never that good except for upsetting the Caps in the playoffs. Elliot is just journeyman that has had some good spurts with different teams.
Wonder if he still does the eye movements routine.He has had a pretty good start to the season. He beat out Khudobin in preseason. Numbers are still good despite the Stars struggles to score. I would still say no because Holtby never developed good chemistry with Scott Murray.
Samsonov is a good prospect and young. I think it would be a mistake to deal him.
I get that but that pace isn’t likely to last and my idea is that it’s nice to bank these points in the early going before more injuries start to pile up or Ovi’s goal scoring tapers off. Four opportunities to snatch another point and they got none. That stinks!Cmon man what are peoples expectations here. We have 14 out of 20 points…that puts us on a 113 point pace. If we continue to play at this pace we will be contending for a Presidents trophy.
Wonder if he still does the eye movements routine.
Actually that's not why. He said in an interview once that it was mental training. When something goes wrong, he squirts the bottle to put sort of refocus, toss the bad thing aside and move on.He does. Why do you think he squirts the water in the water bottle up in the air. Holtby isn't doing that to make sure the water bottle works. Holtby does that to keep sharp on eye movement.
Actually that's not why. He said in an interview once that it was mental training. When something goes wrong, he squirts the bottle to put sort of refocus, toss the bad thing aside and move on.
I get that, I do. But I took him to mean that it was more about concentration than actual eyes. Maybe not.Uh, how do you think you keep you eyes sharp. Mental training! The human brain controls your eye movement!
I think there may be character issues with Sammy too, in addition to the uneven performance on ice. If that was Jensen he was glaring at after the screened goal, then that’s just latest indication for me that he’s not a team guy. I mean it’s one thing to get snippy if you’re an established vet like Lundqvist (who used to get pissed at teammates), but another if you’re a young unproven commodity and if you’re staring daggers at a guy who was objectively having a hell of a game and who has been an excellent player this year. And that’s to say nothing of the ATM accident, the violation of Covid protocols, and then whatever happened during NYC trip last spring which got both him and 92 in trouble.That way you can't keep the wrong guy. To tell the truth neither are really starting NHL calibre goalies. I think Sammy still has chance to be a starter if he gets his head out of his ass.
I think there may be character issues with Sammy too, in addition to the uneven performance on ice. If that was Jensen he was glaring at after the screened goal, then that’s just latest indication for me that he’s not a team guy. I mean it’s one thing to get snippy if you’re an established vet like Lundqvist (who used to get pissed at teammates), but another if you’re a young unproven commodity and if you’re staring daggers at a guy who was objectively having a hell of a game and who has been an excellent player this year. And that’s to say nothing of the ATM accident, the violation of Covid protocols, and then whatever happened during NYC trip last spring which got both him and 92 in trouble.
Guy’s not worth all the hassle IMO. But i’m no expert on goalies specifically nor prospects generally. Just my viewpoint from fan’s perspective
If Sammy goes then Vanecek has to go too. They both suck.