credulous
Registered User
- Nov 18, 2021
- 3,334
- 4,486
i think pettersson could play better but also the team is really doing him a disservice giving him those wingers night after night. hoglander is okay but he's not a top line guy and suter is a depth forward
i really don't understand lindholm's usage. using him to move pettersson or miller to wing would let them put together two decent scoring lines and it's not like garland/blueger wasn't working. this is the same thing we saw when they tried to build three forward lines around each of horvat, miller and pettersson instead of using miller at wing. it didn't work then because they lacked the wings to make it work and it's even worse now. i know kuzmenko was largely written off by the coaching staff but his absence is really apparent. when boeser is the best winger you have to offer and suter, mikheyev, hoglander and pdg are all playing big minutes it's hard to score
i liked the lindholm trade but the lack of followup to add a winger really hurt this team's depth. they just don't have enough up front to hang with the elite teams
i really don't understand lindholm's usage. using him to move pettersson or miller to wing would let them put together two decent scoring lines and it's not like garland/blueger wasn't working. this is the same thing we saw when they tried to build three forward lines around each of horvat, miller and pettersson instead of using miller at wing. it didn't work then because they lacked the wings to make it work and it's even worse now. i know kuzmenko was largely written off by the coaching staff but his absence is really apparent. when boeser is the best winger you have to offer and suter, mikheyev, hoglander and pdg are all playing big minutes it's hard to score
i liked the lindholm trade but the lack of followup to add a winger really hurt this team's depth. they just don't have enough up front to hang with the elite teams