| 2022-04-30 |  Missed the last 22 regular season games (concussion). |
| 2022-03-19 | Concussion, injured reserve. |
| 2022-03-14 | Concussion, day-to-day. |
| 2021-12-09 | Missed 3 games (concussion). |
| 2021-12-03 | Concussion, day-to-day. |
Yessir. We don't need to move anyone, but we can't add anyone without cap going out.
Great, make an offer. What are you sending our way?
I’d temper the enthusiasm over the Boeser deal. It’s far from a good contract. They did manage to successfully convert it from absolute disaster to mildly bad, so I do give’m that.
Swap OEL with Myers and I'd consider it.
I think the Sharks would be fine retaining a couple mil on Karlsson but it'd probably be something like Myers, Poolman, Dickinson, and a draft pick. This also assumes that Karlsson wants to go to Vancouver. Possible but not certain.
Swap OEL for Myers and Canucks no longer consider it. We dont need 2 past their prime #3-4D making a combined 15M + for an eternity.
Probably not unless it was part of a bigger JT Miller trade and even then I think they'd be targeting someone cheaper than Dumba.
That's fine if the fit isn't there. The Sharks aren't in any hurry to move Karlsson until he's ready to go. OEL just has no spot here as the Sharks have a plethora of LHD's between Ferraro, Vlasic, Nutivaara, Simek, Knyzhov, Megna, and Hatakka. OEL is certainly better than most of them maybe all of them but trading Karlsson for OEL only makes sense if it's a straight swap with no retention.
OEL can play the right side, but honestly we are a worse team trading him for Karlsson IMO. OEL played the shut down role from the 2nd line very well last season, and had chemistry with Myers. I think trading a forward for a defenseman with no net get makes the most sense for us as we can afford to lose a top 9 forward right now to improve that position. We have some young guys that can be forced into that role and not look lost if they have one of Miller or Horvat centering them.
Fair and obviously its the same for the Canucks. We dont have an OEL replacement for our 2nd pairing LHD so we dont need to move him but if we could move him for a RHD or to free up cap for a RHD it would make sense. We have Hughes above OEL and Dermott/Rathbone/Burroughs behind him. At RHD we have Myers/Schenn/Poolman. We would be better off to shift Dermott to 2nd pair while moving Schenn/Poolman down to 3rd pairng.
What I wonder about our cap situation, is if Gudbranson gets 4x4 on the open market, does Poolman at 2.5 have value anywhere? I don't really think he is any worse than Gudbranson. other than not being as big and physical, but he skates better.
Realistically Brock is a 30+g 60+ pt player if he can stay healthy over 82 games. His back issue seams to be behind him. As sad as his dads passing is, with his health off his mind, he will play better.
I think if he didnt have injury concerns a team may have for future considerations. It would be like signing him to a 3 year 2.5M deal which IMO, is market value this off-season for a guy like him. Only issue is who knows if he's actually healthy enough to play. i doubt any team trades for him at least til next off-season. He needs to get back on the ice and play 10-20 games without post concussion syndrome before any team even looks his way.
Canucks would obviously be interested, but I don't see the fit. Canucks aren't true buyers - they have some valuable assets at forward that they would look to trade as the main value for a defenceman coming back. I can't see Garland, Boeser, Miller, etc... making sense as the main piece returning from a Minnesota perspective.
No value mainly due to his migraine issues.
