Boom Boom Apathy
I am the Professor. Deal with it!
- Sep 6, 2006
- 48,388
- 98,061
Huh? I have a future considerations tree in my backyard.Where the hell are we gonna get all these future considerations from? It's not like they grow on trees
Huh? I have a future considerations tree in my backyard.Where the hell are we gonna get all these future considerations from? It's not like they grow on trees
so wait, we owe them two future considerations now? where the f*** are we going to find a second future consideration?
The thought had actually crossed my mind.here is a big brain possible idea... this move of taking on a contract that VGK no longer wanted is the future consideration from the first trade, but they didn't want to insult the poor kid by announcing that he was traded because they regret signing him and need the contract slot.
I suppose I never have seen vagrant and Lempo in the same room at the same time (almost certainly wearing tin foil hats in front of boards with strings trying to map out future considerations that are largely known to be nothing).here is a big brain possible idea... this move of taking on a contract that VGK no longer wanted is the future consideration from the first trade, but they didn't want to insult the poor kid by announcing that he was traded because they regret signing him and need the contract slot.
That's... not a hockey name.Diliberatore
For the same reason why the British royalty doesn't travel on the same plane.I suppose I never have seen vagrant and Lempo in the same room at the same time (almost certainly wearing tin foil hats in front of boards with strings trying to map out future considerations that are largely known to be nothing).
The takes would have been interesting at least if the optics was that MaxPac was traded primarily to get rid of Hayes' contract. If Max had been healthy and hogging points for Carolina at the start of the season, it would be quite an intolerable situation for the Vegas brass.here is a big brain possible idea... this move of taking on a contract that VGK no longer wanted is the future consideration from the first trade, but they didn't want to insult the poor kid by announcing that he was traded because they regret signing him and need the contract slot.
Very likely not. Only this season left. But they wanted to get rid of a contract.Hayes is getting paid 80k in the AHL. I doubt its a contract Vegas really pined to get rid of.
Or we could consider that Hayes is a cheap and actual improvement to the defensive roster for Chicago. It’s been really bad. If he doesn’t do well enough to keep longer, the Canes let him walk. East peasy
Hayes is getting paid 80k in the AHL. I doubt its a contract Vegas really pined to get rid of.
Boy those considerations are piling up
Checking username history for "tapi"...I bet we could get a shit-ton of future considerations for Aho.
Think about it: the team sucks, Rod can't coach, and the Borg doesn't know what it's doing. Clearly the next couple years are shot anyways, so why not flip Aho for 8 or 10 future considerations and then get him back when he becomes a UFA?
I mean, that's borderline brilliant! Sometimes I'm so smart I scare myself!
Assuming they’re looking to make a deal that requires extra contract slots or just wanted the flexibility. They didn’t actually have to do this.Vegas was at the contract limit and had to dump someone